Hello
I held of making a patch to change this (to remove it), does Standardeze mean
something:
https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-reflection/index.html
Kind regards
Jonny
On 29/11/2023 13:05, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 12:59, Jonny Grant wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> Has anyone encountered this when compiling gcc from source? libgomp doesn't
>> build due to xgcc missing
>>
>> I got latest git
Hello
Has anyone encountered this when compiling gcc from source? libgomp doesn't
build due to xgcc missing
I got latest git, did
./configure --disable-multilib
make html
It gets stuck here:
checking whether make supports nested variables... yes
/home/jonny/code/repos/gcc_tests/gcc_doc/libgomp
On 26/04/2023 00:04, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 20:21, Jonny Grant wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 25/04/2023 13:22, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 13:17, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue
On 25/04/2023 13:22, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 13:17, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 13:13, Jonny Grant wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
>>>
Hello
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
I wondered 'this_length' refers to in that example, it doesn't compile.
: In function 'main':
:13:34: error: 'this_length' undeclared (first use in this function)
13 | malloc (sizeof (struct line) + this_length);
|
On 11/07/17 09:56, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 11 July 2017 at 17:51, Jonny Grant wrote:
Hello
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html
snprintf (d, sizeof d, "%#02x", x & 0xff);
^^
Should be: sizeof(d) ?
"The sizeof operator yields the size (in bytes) of
Hello
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html
snprintf (d, sizeof d, "%#02x", x & 0xff);
^^
Should be: sizeof(d) ?
I'm not on this mailing list, so please cc me in any replies
Regards, Jonny
On 2 February 2015 at 23:56, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 2 February 2015 at 21:11, Jonny Grant wrote:
>> Is this a consensus agreement to rename those .C -> .cc ?
>
> No.
While I remember:
Stroustrup lists C++ extensions as .cxx and .cpp
http://www.stroustrup.com/glossar
On 03/02/15 23:20, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jonny Grant writes:
How many minutes labor is this task?
What does it fix?
Consistency. Less important if these files are only compiled after GCC
available, to use as a testsuite. Although I understood from other
replies that other files needed
On 02/02/15 21:18, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Jonny Grant wrote:
On 01/02/15 16:34, Kevin Ingwersen (Ingwie Phoenix) wrote:
Am 01.02.2015 um 17:09 schrieb Eli Zaretskii :
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 01:55:29 +
From: Jonathan Wakely
Cc: Andrew Pinski , &quo
On 01/02/15 16:34, Kevin Ingwersen (Ingwie Phoenix) wrote:
Am 01.02.2015 um 17:09 schrieb Eli Zaretskii :
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 01:55:29 +
From: Jonathan Wakely
Cc: Andrew Pinski , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" , Jonny
Grant
These files are only compiled by GCC's own build sys
On 30/01/15 17:09, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 30, 2015, at 4:22 AM, Jonny Grant wrote:
Hello
When I checked out from the trunk I saw that various files had .C
capital extension. Its not a big issue.. but I wondered if they should
be .c like regular source files?
No because they
Hello
When I checked out from the trunk I saw that various files had .C
capital extension. Its not a big issue.. but I wondered if they should
be .c like regular source files?
libitm\testsuite\libitm.c++\static_ctor.C
libitm\testsuite\libitm.c++\dropref.C
libitm\testsuite\libitm.c++\eh-1.C
libit
14 matches
Mail list logo
