On Friday, January 17th, 2025 at 5:44 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
>
> Hi Ihor,
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 08:44:54PM +, Ihor Solodrai via Gcc wrote:
>
> > An example of successful test run (you have to login to github to see
> > the logs):
> > h
On Friday, January 17th, 2025 at 2:44 AM, Jose E. Marchesi
wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Ok. I disabled the execution of the test_progs-bpf_gcc test runner for now.
> >
> > I think we should check on the state of the tests again after decl_tags
> > support is landed.
>
>
> Thank you. Sounds like a pla
On Thursday, January 16th, 2025 at 3:58 PM, Jose E. Marchesi
wrote:
>
> [...]
> > >
> > > Effective BPF selftests denylist for GCC BPF is located here:
> > > https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/vmtest/configs/DENYLIST.test_progs-bpf_gcc
> >
> > The announcement triggered a
On Thursday, January 16th, 2025 at 12:44 PM, Ihor Solodrai
wrote:
>
>
> Hi everyone.
>
> GCC BPF support in BPF CI has been landed.
>
> The BPF CI dashboard is here:
> https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/workflows/test.yml
>
> A summary of what happens on CI (relevant to GCC BPF):
Hi everyone.
GCC BPF support in BPF CI has been landed.
The BPF CI dashboard is here:
https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/workflows/test.yml
A summary of what happens on CI (relevant to GCC BPF):
* Linux Kernel is built on a target source revision
* Latest snapshots of GCC 15 and b
Hi everyone.
I built and ran selftests/bpf with GCC 15-20241229, and would like to
share my findings.
Building required small adjustments in the Makefile, besides -std=gnu17
With the following change we can mitigate int64_t issue:
+progs/test_cls_redirect.c-CFLAGS := -nostdinc
+progs/test_cls_r
On Thursday, January 2nd, 2025 at 1:47 AM, Jose E. Marchesi
wrote:
> Hi Ihor.
> Thanks for working on this! :)
>
> > [...]
> > Older versions compile the dummy program without errors, however on
> > attempt to build the selftests there is a different issue: conflicting
> > int64 definitions (fu
ki via Gcc gcc@gcc.gnu.org writes:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 12:11 PM Ihor Solodrai via Gcc gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello everyone.
> > > > >
> > > > > I picked up the wor
On Monday, December 30th, 2024 at 12:36 PM, Sam James wrote:
>
>
> Andrew Pinski via Gcc gcc@gcc.gnu.org writes:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 12:11 PM Ihor Solodrai via Gcc gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello everyone.
> > >
> >
Hello everyone.
I picked up the work adding GCC BPF backend to BPF CI pipeline [1],
originally done by Cupertino Miranda [2].
I encountered issues compiling BPF objects for selftests/bpf with
recent GCC 15 snapshots. An additional test runner binary is supposed
to be generated by tools/testing/se
10 matches
Mail list logo