--- Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Comparing the cp/ChangeLog files from 4.0.2 and the
> 4_0 branch, it looks
> like the fix is in the release according to the
> current ChangeLog, but
> in fact it wasn't:
Indeed,
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/init.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gc
--- Mark Cuss wrote:
>
> For #1, if I build with --static, then no libraries
> can be linked in
> dynamically at runtime... I need to do this for
> some custom Qt libraries
> and plugins, so I can't just make a completely
> static executable. This is
> unfortunate - the resulting binaries wou
--- Kean Johnston wrote:
> > The GCC team has been urged to drop support for
> SCO
> > Unix from GCC, as a protest against SCO's
> irresponsible
> > aggression against free software and GNU/Linux.
> > We have decided to take no action at this time,
> as we
> > no longer believe that SCO is a seri
--- Kean Johnston wrote:
> Perhaps you should read README.SCO at the top of the
> GCC tree?
README.SCO contains:
"
The GCC team has been urged to drop support for SCO
Unix from GCC, as
a protest against SCO's irresponsible aggression
against free software
and GNU/Linux. We have decided to take n
--- Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> System V Release 5 (UnixWare / OpenServer 6).
>
Your system is NOT supported by GCC, please read
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/sco/
___
How much free photo storage do you g
> --- Diego Novillo wrote:
> > Sorry, I don't understand what you're asking.
> >
> > My line of thought was described in the text that
> > you removed:
> > "However, it would be very useful for us to
> transfer
> > information
> > from the wiki into the manual from time to time."
> >
I am suggest
--- Diego Novillo wrote:
> And we cannot
> do that if we don't have cleared out the copyright
> assignment of
> wiki content.
And so?
___
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Ya
--- Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre writes:
>
> | Other solutions that would fix the bug (but not
> ultimate solutions):
> | 1) Do not claim that gcc is a conforming ISO C
> implementation.
>
> As far as I can see, there is no such claim.
It's implied when using -std=c99
--- Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Four out of how many?
This can not be measured (ie unpredictable), unless
you suggesting you are 100% deterministic on every new
bug presented to you.
___
How much free photo storage do you g
--- Daniel Berlin wrote:
> Again, this is a place where you disagree that this
> should be considered
> a "bug", but refuse to believe that reasonable
> people can disagree on
> it.
Well, Vincent has given detailed explaination on his
views.
What do you mean by "reasonable" here?
--- Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> browsing the mailing-list archives, I can't find
> what's
> the current status of the much discussed Subversion
> migration. The topic just appears to have been
> abandoned
> about three months ago.
It's not abandoned, it can be found at
http://gcc.g
--- Robert Dewar wrote:
> Haren Visavadia wrote:
> > --- Robert Dewar wrote:
>
> > I would expect the seem behaviour for both cases.
>
> why? You have some inaccurate model of computation,
> which in the absence of switches, is not guaranteed.
> Floating-point sem
--- Robert Dewar wrote:
> And so? Why would you expect this particular example
> to give an assertion error. I would not expect an
> assert error here. In unoptimized mode, you
> certainly
> do not expect it, and in optimized mode, I would
> expect the register tracker to know that a and x are
> in
--- Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> Let's take a duplicate of 323, 21809
>
>
> Compiling the code there with icc gives us:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> icc icca.c
> icca.c(7): warning #1572: floating-point equality
> and inequality
> comparisons are unreliable
> assert(a == x);
> ^
>
> ./[EMAIL P
--- "Joseph S. Myers" wrote:
> On Sun, 29 May 2005, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
>
> > You are mistaken, we think GCC isn't buggy about
> 323 because the C/C++
> > standards do not tell us to do better than this.
> If you have higher
> > expectations about floating point and C/C++, you
> should file a bu
--- Michael Veksler wrote:
> Unfortunately, this is not 100% correct. Recently I
> have filed several
> duplicates, *after* searching Bugzilla.
> 1. There are too many ways to phrase a title, and
> too many
>times I search for wrong words.
>
> 2. The same bug may have several different user
>
--- Uros Bizjak wrote:
> At this point, I wonder what is wrong with Bugzilla,
> that those
> programmers don't fill a proper bug report. If there
> is a problem with
> GCC, that is so annoying to somebody, I think that
> at least developers
> could be informed about it via their standard
> chan
--- drugdesign wrote:
> How can I subscribe to GCC mailing list?
Look at http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/lists.html
under section titled "Subscribing/unsubscribing"
___
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your
--- Tom Tromey wrote:
> I'm not sure what Plan B would be. Maybe separate
> libgcj releases
> somehow.
You coulder consider just having GCJ inside GCC but
somehow get it to use GNU Classpath directly, this
would also reduce it needing to be re-sync with GNU
Classpath (which I beleive libgcj is ba
19 matches
Mail list logo
