I'm likely to be suspicious of gcc's claims of support of
cilk plus in the future.
Thank you very much for your help, Ilya I appreciate it. It's good to
find these things out as early as possible.
On 22 April 2016 at 05:31, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> 2016-04-21 7:09 GMT+03:00 Hal Ashb
Another cilk plus question:
Is op_ostream also considered to be outside of cilk plus?
https://www.cilkplus.org/docs/doxygen/include-dir/group___reducers_ostream.html
I am trying to compile the basic "Cilk Plus Tutorial Sources" code as
supplied at http://cilkplus.org/download
reducer-ostream-demo.c
/talks/Intel%20Graphics%20Technology%20for%20general%20purpose%20computing.pdf
Thanks again.
On 20 April 2016 at 19:31, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> 2016-04-20 4:01 GMT+03:00 Hal Ashburner :
>> Release notes say:
>> "Full support for Cilk Plus has been added to the GCC compiler
Release notes say:
"Full support for Cilk Plus has been added to the GCC compiler. Cilk
Plus is an extension to the C and C++ languages to support data and
task parallelism."
gcc-5.2 (centos-7, devtoolset-4) says:
g++ -std=c++14 -Wall -O3 -march=native -fcilkplus vec_add.cpp -o vec_add
vec_add.cp
//alignment.cpp
#include
struct Struct_containing_64aligned_member {
Struct_containing_64aligned_member()
: aligned_var(80)
{}
uint64_t aligned_var __attribute__((aligned(64)));
};
struct Struct_no_aligned_member {
Struct_no_aligned_member()
: var(80)
{}
uint64_t
