Hi, all.
Please CC me when I am mentioned into a mail.
On Thu, 2021-05-20 at 15:16 +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:06 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> > On 5/20/21 2:54 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > So why did you go from applying this per-file to multiple files?
Hi, Richi.
On 08/31, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 1:15 PM Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 10:32 PM Giuliano Belinassi
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > This i
Hi, Richi.
On 08/31, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 10:32 PM Giuliano Belinassi
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is the final report of the "Automatic Parallel Compilation
> > Viability" project. Please notice that this report i
Hi,
This is the final report of the "Automatic Parallel Compilation
Viability" project. Please notice that this report is pretty
similar to the delivered from the 2nd evaluation, as this phase
consisted of mostly rebasing and bug fixing.
Please, reply this message for any question or suggestion.
Hi.
Here I present the second report of the
"Automatic Detection of Parallel Compilation Viability" in Markdown
format.
---
# Automatic Parallel Compilation Viability: Second Report
## Complete Tasks
For the second evaluation,
Hi,
I am attaching here the first report of the
"Automatic Parallel Viability" project. Please feel free to suggest
improvements to the project.
The content below is presented in markdown format, and you can easily
convert it to PDF with pandoc if you feel it uncomfortable to read in
current form
Hi,
On 05/22, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:00 PM Giuliano Belinassi via Gcc
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, all.
> >
> > GCC have a extensive testsuite, that is no news at all. However they are
> > focused on the compiler (cc1*) or in libraries, a
Hi, all.
GCC have a extensive testsuite, that is no news at all. However they are
focused on the compiler (cc1*) or in libraries, and I can't find tests
related to the GCC driver.
Are there tests to the GCC driver? If yes, is there any docs about how
to write them?
Thank you,
Giuliano.
Hi, Richi
On 04/21, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:45 PM Giuliano Belinassi
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi. Sorry for the late reply.
> >
> > On 03/02, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 6:56 PM Giuliano Belinassi
> > > w
Hi. Sorry for the late reply.
On 03/02, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 6:56 PM Giuliano Belinassi
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, all.
> >
> > I am tying to fix an issue with a global variable in the parallel gcc
> > project. For this, I am tryin
for trunk.
Thank you,
Giuliano.
On 03/24, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2020, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
>
> > Hi, Richi
> >
> > On 03/18, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
Hi, Richi
On 03/18, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
>
> > Hi, all
> >
> > I have applied some revews to the project. Please see the new proposal
> > here:
>
> Looks good, some editorial changes below
>
Hi, all
I have applied some revews to the project. Please see the new proposal
here:
https://www.ime.usp.br/~belinass/Automatic_Detection_of_Parallel_Compilation_Viability.pdf
**Automatic Detection of Parallel Compilation Viability**
[Giuliano Belinassi]{style="color: darkgreen"}
Hi, Richi
Thank you for your review!
On 03/16, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2020, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
>
> > Hi, all
> >
> > I want to propose and apply for the following GSoC project: Automatic
> > Detection of Parallel Compilation Viability.
>
Hi, Shivan.
On 03/15, shivam tiwari via Gcc wrote:
> In Which Format I have to Send Gsoc Proposal On this Mail PDF or DOC Format
Perhaps the best way to write your proposal is to write LaTeX, and
then convert it to Markdown using pandoc, and attach it to the mailing
list. One example of this appr
of Parallel Compilation Viability**
[Giuliano Belinassi]{style="color: darkgreen"}\
Timezone: GMT$-$3:00\
University of São Paulo -- Brazil\
IRC: giulianob in \#gcc\
Email: [`giuliano.belina...@usp.br`](mailto:giuliano.belina...@usp.br)\
Github: <https://github.com/giulianobelinassi/&g
Hi, all.
I am tying to fix an issue with a global variable in the parallel gcc
project. For this, I am trying to move some global variables from
tree-ssa-operands to struct function. One of this variable is a
vec type, and gengtype doesn't look so happy with it.
In this context, I am trying to ad
Hi all,
Here is my second evaluation report, together with a simple program that
I was able to compile with my parallel version of GCC. Keep in mind that
I still have lots of concurrent issues inside the compiler and therefore
my branch will fail to compile pretty much anything else.
To reproduce
Hi,
***
Question: What are all the possible ways to allocate and deallocate memory
through the Garbage Collector?
***
Context: I am parallelizing GCC internals and I am facing problems with the GCC
Garbage Collector, and therefore I need to make it threadsafe to continue with
the project.
Curren
On 06/25, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2019, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
>
> > Hi, Richard
> >
> > On 06/25, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> >
Hi
On 06/24, nick wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-06-24 8:59 a.m., Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Parallelize GCC with Threads -- First Evaluation
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I am attaching the first evaluation report here publicly for gat
Hi, Richard
On 06/25, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Parallelize GCC with Threads -- First Evaluation
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I am attaching the first evaluation report here pub
Hi,
Parallelize GCC with Threads -- First Evaluation
Hi everyone,
I am attaching the first evaluation report here publicly for gathering
feedback. The file is in markdown format and it can be easily be converted to
PDF for better visualization.
I am also open to suggestions and ideas in order t
On 05/13, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sun, 12 May 2019, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
>
> > Hi, Richard
> >
> > On 05/07, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Mon, 6 May 2019, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
>
Hi, Richard
On 05/07, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 6 May 2019, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 03/29, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, Richard
> > > >
Hi,
On 03/29, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
>
> > Hi, Richard
> >
> > On 03/28, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 2:55 PM Giuliano Belinassi
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
Hi,
I wrote my GSoC Proposal to the "Parallelize GCC with threads" project,
and if someone is interested in it, I am linking the text here in order
to get feedback. Please let me know if something is not entirely clear,
or if there are any problems with the calendar, or if you have any
suggestions
Hi, Richard
On 03/28, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 2:55 PM Giuliano Belinassi
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 03/26, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2019, David Malcolm wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 20
gt; Cheers,
> > >
> > > Nick
> >
> > It's good to see that you've gotten as far as attaching a patch to BZ
> > [1]
> >
> > I think someone was going to attempt the "parallelize compilation using
> > threads" idea last year,
Hi,
I was just wondering what API should I use to spawn threads and control
its flow. Should I use OpenMP, pthreads, or something else?
My point what if we break compatibility with something. If we use
OpenMP, I'm afraid that we will break compatibility with compilers not
supporting it. On the ot
Hi,
Since gimple-match.c takes so long to compile, I was wondering if it
might be possible to reorder the compilation so we can push its
compilation early in the dependency graph.
I've attached a graphic showing what I mean and the methodology into
PR84402 (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
ard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 12:41 PM Giuliano Belinassi
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am currently studying the GIMPLE IR documentation and thinking about a
> > way easily gather the timing information. I was thinking about about
> > adding t
Hi,
I am currently studying the GIMPLE IR documentation and thinking about a
way easily gather the timing information. I was thinking about about
adding this feature to gcc to show/dump the elapsed time on GIMPLE. Does
this makes sense? Is this already implemented somewhere? Where is a good
way to
Hi,
See comments inline.
On 12/13, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:46 PM Giuliano Augusto Faulin Belinassi
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, I have some news. :-)
> >
> > I replicated the Martin Liška experiment [1] on a 64-cores machine for
> > gcc [2] and Linux kernel [3] (Linux kernel was fu
34 matches
Mail list logo