at 10:01 PM David Malcolm wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-09-15 at 15:20 +0330, Ghorban M. Tavakoly via Gcc wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 11:59 AM Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 1:17 PM Ghorban M. Tavakoly via Gcc
> > >
Hi, and thank you for your answer.
Is there an option to have LTO in the final GCC, but without using LTO in
compiling GCC itself?
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 9:00 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 1:17 PM Ghorban M. Tavakoly via Gcc
> wrote:
> >
> > >> Is
Hi
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 11:59 AM Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 1:17 PM Ghorban M. Tavakoly via Gcc
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >> Is there any change to have some LTO progress indicator information
> in
> > > upstream GCC outpu
>> Is there any change to have some LTO progress indicator information in
upstream GCC output? Do I need to report a bug?
Is there any chance ... (sorry for typo)
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 2:41 PM Ghorban M. Tavakoly
wrote:
> I build GCC from git repo regularly. Unfortunately my system is old and
I build GCC from git repo regularly. Unfortunately my system is old and a
full GCC build takes about 30 hours. I learnt that the maximum build time
spent is in LTO. I wrote a simple shell script to check LTO progress:
#!/bin/sh
AWKP='
BEGIN { RS=" " ; w = COLS - 19 }
END { progressbar(current, to
