when compared to:
> typedef int j;
> typedef int j; // legal in C++03, invalid as a duplication definition in C99
Heh, that's strange ;-)
Thanks for your further clarification :-)
> -- James
--
Best regards,
Eus (FSF member #4445)
In this digital era, where computing technolo
TU defining its own definition
> > without "extern".
>
> These are not identical, but the meaning in C is complex because it
> changes depending on which standard you are using. Look at the docs
> for
> the -fgnu89-inline option and the gnu_inline function attribute.
A
rn *bar + 5;
}
and
int foo (int *bar)
{
return *bar + 5;
}
?
I think they are also identical. Am I right? Who knows the one with
"extern" can be overridden in another TU defining its own definition
without "extern".
Thank you for your help :-)
> --
> Joseph S. Myers
&
Hi Ho!
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 13:49 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Eus wrote:
> > Hi Ho!
> >
> > On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 15:29 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>> So while trapping variants can certainly be introduced it looks like
> >>> this task may be m
story, but
> especially for the sake of LTO I think this is the way to go.
>
> Paolo
--
Best regards,
Eus (FSF member #4445)
In this digital era, where computing technology is pervasive, your
freedom depends on the software controlling those computing devices.
Join free software movem
ause this can ensure that the install dir will be new gcc's path.
>
> If this is ok, I will post a little patch.
>
> Zhang Le
Best regards,
Eus
Hi Ho!
--- On Fri, 9/19/08, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> In this case the end result is an x86-build
> native-MIPS compiler.
> >> This requires first building an x86-x-MIPS
> copmiler. Of cour
ding x86-x-MIPS Compiler
2. Building native-MIPS Compiler with the previously built x86-x-MIPS Compiler
> Ian
Best regards,
Eus
he interesting part on the latest release of the NEWS on the
CVS but to no avail.
Thank you for your help.
> Dennis
Best regards,
Eus
d
--enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-checking --with-gnu-ld
--verbose --target=i486-slackware-linux --host=i486-slackware-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.3.6
Best regards,
Eus
to hear that!
> thanks for kicking me in the right direction! although i am
> quite
> ashamed that i had to take your time, i could find this
> myself, sorry
> for that :)
That's okay. We are here to help each other :)
> many thanks again,
Your welcome.
> mojmir
Best regards,
Eus
still cannot retrieve anything with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so that we can debug the problem.
Best regards,
Eus
--- On Sat, 6/28/08, Eus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ho!
>
> --- On Fri, 6/27/08, Mojmir Svoboda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > *sigh*, i do not like to l
I think, none. I also try [EMAIL PROTECTED] just now. So, I'll tell you
tomorrow if I have something.
> many thanks for your time,
> mojmir
Your welcome.
Best regards,
Eus
13 matches
Mail list logo
