're
currently working adding 19 new devices for the next release cycle.
Eric Weddington
iki? How does this work with a patch system? How do you propose to resolve
conflicts between a user edit, and maintainer's patch? Maybe I'm ignorant to
the capabilities of a wiki, but this is where it sounds like incompatible
systems.
Eric Weddington
libiberty, since it's job is to provide
> portability
> > between systems.
>
> This is also true, so I suppose it's not entirely correct to say that
> this is not a gcc issue in the slightest. This above should indeed go
> into libiberty as the long term solution.
I would have thought that too.
For reference, there is this GCC bug report:
<http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30972>
Eric Weddington
/usr/local --enable-doc --disable-libssp
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.2.0 20070430 (prerelease) (WinAVR 2007xxyy)
This is building from the "core" .bz2 and "c++" .bz2 packages.
Eric Weddington
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Stump [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 6:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: how to start using gcc on windows
>
> On Apr 28, 2007, at 5:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have looked hard, bu
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Stump [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 4:28 PM
> To: Eric Weddington
> Cc: 'Steven Bosscher'; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; 'Joerg Wunsch';
> 'Anatoly Sokolov'
> Subject: Re: GCC -On opti
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Lance Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 4:20 PM
> To: Eric Weddington
> Cc: 'Steven Bosscher'; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; 'Joerg Wunsch';
> 'Anatoly Sokolov'
> Subject: Re: GCC -On
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Bosscher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:52 PM
> To: Eric Weddington
> Cc: Kenneth Hoste; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues
>
> On 4/17/07, Eric Wedd
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Bosscher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:52 PM
> To: Eric Weddington
> Cc: Kenneth Hoste; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues
>
> On 4/17/07, Eric Wedd
> -Original Message-
> From: Kenneth Hoste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 3:23 AM
> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues
> - finline-functions is enabled at -Os, but isn't listed so
And it seems to have some issues:
quality is deemed sufficient. If it takes longer to do a
release then so be it. Politely point out what is left to get done. The
status reports are a helpful reminder of the state of the branch.
Eric Weddington
my list.
Please note that I am *only* interested in bugs that affect, or may affect,
the AVR port at this time. I have no desire to mess around with bugs that
involve other areas.
Thanks for your time,
Eric Weddington
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Korn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 9:59 AM
> To: 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
> Cc: 'Andrew Haley'; 'Kai Tietz'; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: RE: Question for removing trailing whitespaces (not
> vertical tab) from source
>
> On 13 Ma
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Bosscher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 3:55 AM
> To: Eric Weddington
> Cc: Paul Brook; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Shaun Jackman;
> avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR byte swap optim
e able to recognise these
> idioms without
> using the builtin, but AFAIK that's not been implemented yet.
Plus there is a long lead time between when it is implemented on HEAD, then
branched, released from a branch, and then when it shows up in binary
distributions.
Eric Weddington
You could always equate the macro to some inline assembly like what is done
for a number of avr-libc macros.
Eric Weddington
> -Original Message-
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> org] On Behalf Of Shaun Jackman
> Sent: Friday, November 17,
econdary is a good thing, and about time
too. Thank you for proposing this.
What would it take to get the avr target to secondary platform status? Not
that I believe it will happen immediately.
Thanks
Eric Weddington
tupid for the FSF to
assume that the only way a user will use the software is that they build it
themselves. There should be an innate ability and a simple and easy method
for relocation of the software.
Eric Weddington
s (because of the confirmation
process). Is there someone who could help me with this offline?
Thanks for your time.
Eric Weddington
19 matches
Mail list logo
