On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:10:14PM -0400, Ross Ridge wrote:
> Dustin Laurence wrote:
> >Yeah, though even that is more heavyweight than coroutines, so your job
> >is harder than mine.
>
> Hmm? I don't see how the "Lua-style" coroutines you're looking
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 09:50:29AM -0400, Maurizio Vitale wrote:
> I'm looking at the very same problem, hoping to get very lightweight
> user-level threads for use in discrete event simulation.
Yeah, though even that is more heavyweight than coroutines, so your job
is harder than mine. On the
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 05:34:41PM -0500, David Nicol wrote:
> On 6/16/06, Dustin Laurence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >...
> >is. :-) OTOH if it is possible I'd consider trying to write it, if my
> >GCC-fu ever reaches the requisite level (my rank is somewhere
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:05:13PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jun 16, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Dustin Laurence wrote:
> >I'm pretty sure this is stepping into deep quicksand
>
> No, just hard work. It is only quicksand, if you start, but never
> finish.
It's quicksa
I'm pretty sure this is stepping into deep quicksand, but I'll ask
anyway...I'm interested in writing an FE for a language that has
stackable coroutines (Lua-style, where you can yield and resume
arbitrarily far down the call stack). I'm trying to wrap my head around
what would be involve and how
FWIW, I much prefer the navigation bar on the left no matter what
browser I'm using.
Dustin
pgpRTYu9WRFhX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 12:36:42PM -0700, Peter Michael Gerdes wrote:
>
> Does Hegel actually have good arguments for his views or is he just
> musing and throwing out ideas? If not why should we take him seriously?
I don't think any of his patches have been accepted by GCC, so I'd say
his arg
idea if this is the appropriate way to do
it):
2006-05-13 Dustin Laurence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Added .cc and .hh suffixes to gengtype.c from the gcjx branch.
Dustin
Hi,
I am making some contributions to a package that the authors hope will
someday go into the GCC mainline, so I need to execute a copyright
assignment. It's probably easier to make it for "all future
contributions" to GCC or even to GNU so we don't have to do this ever
again. :-)
At the moment
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 05:10:25PM -0300, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
> Two friends and I have started to write a toy scheme front end.
You know, I've always wondered why there wasn't a lisp-family front end
for GCC, the roots of GNU and RMS being where they are (and didn't RMS
promise way back when
I'm fiddling around with a GCC 4 front-end tutorial that would be more
detailed and hands-on than anything I've found so far on the web. It's
a bit like the blind leading the blind, but it makes me learn better and
while I'm learning it I don't mind writing it up, but after I learn it
I've got bet
11 matches
Mail list logo
