Quoting David Fang :
Apart from parallelism, I wished the stage 2,3 compilations had a hook
for ccache-ing
Even better would be distcc, i.e. distribute the new compilers
around a cluster so you don't need to have all your cores and DIMMS
on the same motherboard to harness hugely ma
ache-hitting in
stage 2. I've done this with clang manual bootstraps, for example.
Fang
--
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
x27;m particularly interested in a darwin port, but would benefit from
having it work on any modern platform.)
Fang
--
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
e
keeping it meaningful?
Fang
--
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
he missing files to the PPL 0.11 release directory.
Please let us know if you have further problems.
Cheers,
Roberto
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
e dwarf2 support is too immature in the Xcode for darwin8 to
safely do that.
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
Richard.
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
C++ for non-libstdc++ libraries and data structures?
iostreams, for example, uses multiple inheritance (even multiple virtual
inheritance), should that be sufficient grounds for forbidding use of
iostreams?
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
--host=powerpc-apple-darwin8
--target=powerpc-apple-darwin8
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5370)
Apple Computer, Inc. version cctools-622.9~2, GNU assembler version 1.38
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
.
Also, the end of the generated script attempts to move a bunch of files in
the test area, so if you ship the script to another machine, you can skip
that part.
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
++ changes came from 3.4 and 4.0.
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
es, including ios_base. This is more an issue of mis-using the
standard ostream class.
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
of the base that are private, and thus inaccessible to any derived
classes.
In your thing::thing ctor:
"xo(y)" initializes the member *reference* (essentially taking the address
of y), whereas "xo = y;" is assigning the *object* referenced by 'ox',
which is not the
CC that
already does something "similar" in say one of the optimisation passes
so i can get a look at how to get started on this?
Fang
David Fang
Computer Systems Laboratory
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Cornell University
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
-- (2400 baud? Netscape 3.0?? lynx??? No problem!)
=11764
Still accepts-invalid with g++-4.3.2.
compiles with out errors in g++. The result is as if f is declared with
F f;
This is the case with the stock/latest GCC in Debian GNU/Linux x86_64
(v.4.1.2) and in Cygwin (v.3.4.4).
Is this the intended behavior?
No. :)
Fang
David Fang
is call in email afterward, so that
mechanism will also be available to lurkers.
Is there a chance of any sort of streaming audio broadcast instead of
having to dial in?
Fang
David Fang
Computer Systems Laboratory
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Cornell University
http://www.csl.cor
rejected your example on your
error-marked lines for a long time)
Try the following for kicks:
typedef signed int sint;
typedef unsigned intuint;
typedef const int cint;
typedef const sint csint;
typedef const uint cuint;
and replace them where you use ctor style ini
I still think that is too strong a position. A good fraction
of compiler time is spent bugging out user code.. one could
even say the job of a compiler is not generating machine code,
but telling programmers they're idiots :)
Every compiler version I've tried has been telling me this for years.
> On 6/16/07, michael.a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > As for "placement new", from what I can find, it is unsafe to use with any
> > memory that isn't part of the heap.
> Huh? It can be used with stack variables, we have tests in the
> testsuite where we use it with such.
>
> > As for the
e always intended to hack the bugger (in the always
> bandied about GNU tradition) if I must. It bothers me though to think that
> no one has charted this territory before.
David Fang
Computer Systems Laboratory
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Cornell University
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
-- (2400 baud? Netscape 3.0?? lynx??? No problem!)
> > Dozens, literally, just browse the bug database. If you want to help, pick
> > one of them and try to fix it.
> >
> How?
> I can not browse http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ because has not the
> 'browse' button.
Ah, the joys of bugzilla.
For 4.1 issues, you can go to GCC's front page and under P
> > > I think it's worth raising the minimum required version from 2.5.4 to
> > > 2.5.31.
> >
> > I want to point out that Fedora Core 5 appears to still ship flex
> > 2.5.4. At least, that is what flex --version reports. (I didn't
> > bother to check this before.) I think we need a very strong
> > > > Are 4.0 snapshots still necessary? I suspect they should be
> > > > discontinued.
> > >
> > > 4.0 still seems to be regarded as an active branch.
> > >
> > > I don't mind closing it, myself. Does anybody think we should have a
> > > 4.0.4 release?
> >
> > I'd like to see it closed. W
ld initialize the pointer table with it's implementation for
> the base class pure virtual function before the base class constructor
> call to the pure virtual function?
>
> Is this behaviour a cause of the C++ standard or is it specific to GCC?
David Fang
Computer Systems Laborato
> > There might be a subtle issue with ccache assuming that the compiler
> > that created a cache-hit object did not change. I'm only aware of
> > ccache verifying compiler versions (string compare) in the
> > hit-check, which alone doesn't suffice to guarantee that the cache
> > is (or should be)
Reported (and confirmed) here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=29879
> SVN revision: 118945
> Host: i686-pc-linux-gnu
>
> /home/daniel/svn-build/gcc-head/./gcc/xgcc
> -B/home/daniel/svn-build/gcc-head/./g
> cc/ -B/home/daniel/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-svn//i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/
> -B/ho
Hi,
> > My question is: how to build gcc bootstrap with distcc correctly.
>
> I believe it is impossible in the general case. bootstrap means to
> compile GCC source code with a GCC compiler just built from the same
> source code. Hence, to distribute this compilation with distcc, you'll
> need
> > > I made some suggestions on the Wiki
> > >
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AboutGCCConfiguration
> > >
> > > Again, feel free to edit the above page (and/or incorporate parts of
> > > it into the documentation).
Looks like it was relocated to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Regenerating_GCC_Configur
> I am not sure to understand what is the *reliable* way to regenerate
> GCC configure files from the real (human typed) master source files
> (like Makefile.in, gcc/configure.ac, Makefile.tpl, etc...)
>
> I made some suggestions on the Wiki
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AboutGCCConfiguration
>
>
>
>I noticed that the automake maintainers accepted your patch for
> fixing the multilib issues in automake. However they also seemed to
> indicate that there would be no more 1.9.x automake releases.
>Is the r117741 svn checkin related to this issue? I ask because it
> was unclear to me how
> On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 20:21 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > > i386-unknown-freebsd
>
> The last time a freebsd testresult was sent to the list from the
> mainline was in May, maybe that is a sign that we should downgrade it to
> secondary from primary.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
I've got an i38
> > Bradley Lucier writes:
> Brad> 4.2 hasn't bootstrapped on powerpc-apple-darwin G5 machine for a very
> Brad> long time. I'm seeing the same problem as
> Brad> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27121
> Brad> It would be nice if this were remedied. I do try to test gcc
> Brad> ver
Hi,
I tried to add myself to the CC list of a PR (27397), but get the
following error message:
"You tried to change the Keywords field from ice-on-invalid-code,
error-recovery, monitored to error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code,
monitored, but only the assignee or reporter of the bug, or a s
Hi,
Since 3.4, (template-)dependent lookup has been changed to conform
to the standard. In particular, from http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html:
"In a template definition, unqualified names will no longer find members
of a dependent base."
This allows lookups to be bound at template
Hi,
Didn't see a reply yet, so I'll chime in.
The relevant text appears in gcc-3.4's release notes:
"When binding an rvalue of class type to a reference, the copy constructor
of the class must be accessible."
PR 12226 seems to be the mother bug related to this (many dupes).
Fang
> foo.c
nd it too.
I used to find Zarro Boogs, until I remembered to search for
"ALL term_to_search_for". The keyword 'ALL' is kind of important.
David Fang
ever manifested in any of
the official releases, 4.0.0 through 4.0.2 --- it is senseless to report
it against a prerelease.
SUSE 10.0 developers might want to be aware of this if they are
only using 4.0.2 (20050901 prerelease).
David Fang
gctest
===
1 of 1 tests failed
===
make[3]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/local/install/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/boehm-gc'
make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/local/install/gcc/i
38 matches
Mail list logo
