WMMX instructions in GCC ?
or
Don't try to use the current implementation with WMMX ?
Thanks,
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 21:39 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anyone know how well gcc-4.4 works with ARM and wmmx instructions ?
> >
> > I'm working on cegcc. It currently says :
> > pavilion: {86} arm-mingw32ce-g
ere in the source this message is generated.
It is not clear whether this is caused by errors in my port, or whether
gcc has some other problem with this.
Has anyone used this ?
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 15:40 +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> > It turns out that different functions are used :
> > - my 4.4 implementation takes its multiply code from dp-bit.c
> > - the 4.1 implementation takes it from ieee754-df.S
> >
> > I've now tweake
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 15:40 +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 14:51 +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 15:06 +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:52 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> > > > Danny Backx wrote:
> > >
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 14:51 +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 15:06 +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:52 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> > > Danny Backx wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 10:07 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
&
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 15:06 +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:52 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> > Danny Backx wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 10:07 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> >
> > > Kai Ruottu wrote :
> > >> Comparing the output fro
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:52 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 10:07 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>
> > Kai Ruottu wrote :
> >> Comparing the output from some earlier working GCC with the gcc-4.4.0
> >> output would reveal if som
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 15:17 +0300, Kai Ruottu wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
> > Danny Backx wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 10:07 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> >
> >> Kai Ruottu wrote :
> >>> Comparing the output from some earlier working GCC with the gcc
le-checking --with-headers --disable-__cxa_atexit
Thread model: win32
gcc version 4.4.0 (GCC)
pavilion: {20}
BTW I've put all of this directory up at
http://danny.backx.info/download/cegcc/test.tar.gz . (117686 bytes)
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
d fourth printf statements points
out that a problem exists in arithmetic. (dd and ddd should be equal.)
The latter problem is the more urgent one for me.
Thanks for any help at all..
Danny
P.S. All the code (tweaked gcc, binutils, etc) is in the SVN of the
cegcc project at http://
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 09:49 +1000, Ben Elliston wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 19:55 +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
>
> > Ok, a command line option is what I have. I'll try to clean up my
> > patch shortly, and see if it still applies cleanly in a recent gcc
> > tree. Ou
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 09:27 +1000, Ben Elliston wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 22:16 +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
>
> > Gcov normally puts the files where it writes profiling information in
> > the source directory. In a cross-development environment, that directory
> >
mmand line arguement -fcoverage-base=xx
which can be used like this :
arm-wince-cegcc-gcc -g -D_WIN32_IE=0x0400 --coverage -fcoverage-base="\
\storage card\\devel" -o fibo.exe fibo.c
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
signature.asc
De
Dave,
After removing the gcc/as file as I wrote yesterday, the build does work
and it is possible to cross-compile a working hello-world app.
Danny
Forwarded Message
> From: Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: CeGCC Development List <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Renaming that file made the build progress beyond my initial problem.
I think this is a bug in gcc/g++. Right ?
Danny
On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 21:05 +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> I've run ./xgcc -dumpspecs but I don't know what to look at. That one
> doesn't contain the
order in which I am building things,
look at build.sh, (2) the exact parameters, look at settings.sh and
build-gcc.sh .
Thanks,
Danny
On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 19:33 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 24 July 2006 18:31, Danny Backx wrote:
>
>
> > I can build a cross-gcc as long as I te
b 1.14.0
ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/newlib/index.html
ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/newlib/newlib-1.14.0.tar.gz
- gdb 6.4
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/gdb/gdb-6.4.tar.bz2
- binutils from cvs, 16 May 2006
We are using this version because there is no re
18 matches
Mail list logo
