Am 09.05.2012 20:30, schrieb Ian Lance Taylor:
Daniel Marschall writes:
I did understand that the compiler used "signed" multiplication
instead of an unsigned one because char*char needs to be extended.
Maybe I am wrong, but couldn't the compiler "know" that th
Am 09.05.2012 21:48, schrieb Marc Glisse:
On Wed, 9 May 2012, Daniel Marschall wrote:
1. I do not know my DisplayName/DisplayFamily (0f_2h or 0f_3h?).
Ask your processor (cpuid). Or your kernel (/proc/cpuinfo on linux).
/proc/cpuinfo says:
processor : 0
vendor_id
the same latency of movsw (but not sure) and I
think that "imul" in the table refers to AT&T's "imulq" resp. Intel's
"imul rcx, rsi" while "imul r32" in the table refers to AT&T's "imull"
resp. Intel's "imul ec
the
"amd64" version of Debian is the correct one, or should our admin have
installed the "ia64" variant since it is an Intel CPU?)
Best regards
Daniel Marschall
--enable-objc-gc --with-arch-32=i586 --with-tune=generic
--enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread-Modell: posix
gcc-Version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-8)
(Note: It is the latest version I can get. Since it is a production
system I cannot install newer unstable versions and I do not have a
Linux box at home.)
Best regards
Daniel Marschall
