2017-03-13 11:56 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Wakely :
> On 12 March 2017 at 13:21, Daniel Krügler wrote:
>> I'm now working on
>>
>> http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2861
>>
>> The new wording state is now equivalent to basic_string_view, whose
&g
I'm now working on
http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2861
The new wording state is now equivalent to basic_string_view, whose
current implementation doesn't bother verifying the requirement, so
this code (which as UB) currently compiles just fine:
#include
#include
struct MyTrai
2016-07-27 20:25 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wakely :
> I propose that we remove the following non-standard traits in GCC 7:
>
> /// has_trivial_default_constructor (temporary legacy)
> template
>struct has_trivial_default_constructor
>: public integral_constant
>{ } _GLIBCXX_DEPRECATED;
>
>
2012/7/3 Paolo Carlini :
> On 07/03/2012 10:10 PM, Daniel Krügler wrote:
>>
>> Isn't there a similar problem with the long long related additions of
>> virtual function to IO/localization as in std::num_get and std::num_put?
>
> Probably not, because, if I understa
2012/7/3 Paolo Carlini :
> Hi,
>
> On 07/03/2012 09:18 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>
>> 2) Object layout changes to std::list and std::basic_string. For these
>> types, there is no way to both retain backward compatibility with older
>> C++98 code and conform to the C++11 standard. The best we can
