agree to mentor it ?
Christophe Jaillet
"J.C. Pizarro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> $ svn -q co svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk gcc
> $ du -s .
> 1044451 .
> $
>
> It's 1'069'517'824 characters made from keyboards and generators!!!
>
> That massive!!! And slower checkout after several minutes!!!
In fact, the url of the project seams to be http://rtlcheck.sourceforge.net/
CJ
"Moritz Muehlenhoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
> I'm working on a research project that performs static source code
vulnerability
> analysis on the RTL layer. (http://
Maybe this is not an issue but in the files 'emit-rtl.c' and
'config/i386.c', PI is represented as a string :
|
v
3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078
('emit-rtl.c')
3.1415926535897932385128089594061862044 ('config/i386.c')
code...)
Is there a prefered version ?
Do you think that looking deeper into would be interesting and would impove
gcc ?
Is there an *easy* way to compare memory consuption and execution time to
figure out which version should be prefered ?
Christophe Jaillet
...and in cygwin boxes when you forget to remove the anti virus :)
By the way, thanks for you and Ben Elliston for the answers.
CJ
"Nix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 13 Jan 2006, Ben Elliston uttered the following:
> >> I apologize if this question
I apologize if this question has already been answered but I would like to
know if there is a way to reuse the same config.cache file for all the
builds of all the subdirectories of a bootstrap ?
In my case, it would speed up a lot the whole process.
CJ
Hi,
in file 'bt-load.c', in function 'augment_live_range', some memory is
xmalloc'ed. It seems to be possible to never free it, if all the first tests
are true.
Yhe memory is only freed once at the end of the function.
CJ
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
memory usage reduction) neither the
impact in performance.
If anyone interested, I can try it and do a bootstrap but I don't have the
tools to perform benchmark (memory usage or speed of the compiler)
Christophe Jaillet
Reading point 3. of "Removal of duplicate effort at
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Speedup%20areas, I got the following idea :
First of all, I don't think that it is actually done by gcc. If I'm wrong or
if this idea doesn't worse the effort, just forget about it.
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
Man
e used. I think that
some may not be initialized properly.
Christophe Jaillet
11 matches
Mail list logo
