On 11/11/2011 3:17 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Chris Metcalf wrote:
I'm cc'ing the gcc mailing list with this reply, so if someone there
can provide an authoritative statement, that would be great. It looks
like right now the i386/x86_64, ia64
On 11/11/2011 1:09 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
2011-11-09 Chris Metcalf
* bits/byteswap.h (__bswap*): Use __builtin_bswap for gcc 4.3 and
above. Improves code generation for gcc 4.3 and 4.4 compilers
without bswap pattern detection.
This seems reasonable if some GCC folks can
uild glibc. Seems
pretty yucky to me.)
Take a look at the "gcc and glibc from scratch" section of
http://www.tilera.com/scm/source.html . I don't know if this will handle
your problem, but we do end up with libgcc_eh.a when the dust settles, and
it avoids having to build uClibc :-)
--
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com
On 2/16/2011 3:46 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>>> For what it's worth, the Tilera 64-bit architecture (forthcoming) includes
>>> support for a 32-bit compat
the 64-bit and 32-bit binaries just by the Elf class, a
proposed by H.J. above. This seems plausible given that it does capture
the differences correctly; everything else is the same, just the Elf
class. (And we use /lib vs /lib32 on the 64-bit platform to support the
32-bit shared libraries, etc.)
--
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com
