On 10/22/2014 09:44 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 22 October 2014 02:46, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 10/15/14 18:07, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> On 10/13/14 21:18, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>> On 10/13/14 18:53, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>>>> On 10/12/2014 10:32 AM, Chen
On 10/15/14 18:07, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 10/13/14 21:18, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 10/13/14 18:53, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>> On 10/12/2014 10:32 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>>[root@localhost qemu_cc]# cat test.cc
>>>>const char n() { return 1; }
On 10/13/14 21:18, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 10/13/14 18:53, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On 10/12/2014 10:32 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>[root@localhost qemu_cc]# cat test.cc
>>>const char n() { return 1; }
>>>const char c = n();
>>>[root@localhost
On 10/13/14 22:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:01:31PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> Is it correct?
>
> This mailing list is for development of GCC, not the right place to learn
> C++. Please ask either on gcc-help mailing list, or on some C++ user
>
On 10/13/14 21:59, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> On 10/13/14 21:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 09:10:31PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> Oh, yes. Originally I got this warning by compiling Qemu. And sorry for
>>> my sample (test.cc) may be not quite pr
On 10/13/14 21:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 09:10:31PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> Oh, yes. Originally I got this warning by compiling Qemu. And sorry for
>> my sample (test.cc) may be not quite precise.
>>
>> For me, I guess:
>>
>> - I
On 10/13/14 18:53, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 10/12/2014 10:32 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>[root@localhost qemu_cc]# cat test.cc
>>const char n() { return 1; }
>>const char c = n();
>>[root@localhost qemu_cc]# /usr/local/bin/g++ -Wall -O0 -c -o test.o
>&
On 10/13/14 18:58, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 12 October 2014 16:32, Chen Gang wrote:
>> Hello All:
>>
>> I found an issue about g++, it is OK for "-Wall -O0", but will report
>> -Wunused-variable for "-Wall -O1|2|3|s". The original version (e.
-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --disable-multilibs --disable-nls
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20141003 (experimental) (GCC)
If we are sure it is a bug, I shall try to analyze it within this month.
Thanks
--
Chen Gang
Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
On 06/16/2014 09:36 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
[...]
>
> Hi,
>
> Please send patches to gcc-patches mailing list.
>
OK, thanks, and excuse me as a newbie to send a patch to the incorrect
mailing list.
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
On 06/14/2014 05:45 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
> dw2_asm_output_vms_delta() calls dw2_asm_output_delta() in an abnormal
> way, so need add a new function just like vprintf() for printf(), and
> then the related call will be in normal way.
>
> The related warning:
>
> ../../gc
*, const char*, const char*, ...)’:
../../gcc/gcc/dwarf2asm.c:167:50: warning: format not a string literal and no
format arguments [-Wformat-security]
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
---
gcc/ChangeLog | 6 ++
gcc/dwarf2asm.c | 23 +++
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 8
On 09/13/2013 01:02 PM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
> 2013/9/13 Chen Gang :
>> > On 09/13/2013 01:09 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> >> On 09/11/2013 10:38 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>> >>> Hello all:
>>>> >>>
> [...]
>>>> >>
On 09/13/2013 01:09 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 09/11/2013 10:38 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> Hello all:
>>
>> I have send the related issues to "http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla";, please
>> check if you like, thanks.
>>
>> currently, I only send 3 bugs: Bu
r compiler development).
Welcome any members' suggestions or completions :-).
Thanks.
On 09/11/2013 09:02 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 09/11/2013 03:55 AM, Michael Schewe wrote:
>> Hello Maintainers,
>>
>> if you like to drop h8/300 support in linux kernel, thats OK for me.
>
lated mails, better always include binut...@sourceware.org
(although may it is only for gcc issues) ?
Is it correct ? (if it is correct, not need reply)
Thanks.
> Chen Gang schrieb:
>> On 09/10/2013 10:19 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 09/09/2013 07:13 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>&
On 09/10/2013 10:19 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 07:13 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> Hello Maintainers:
>>
>> After google search and check the Linux kernel, H8/300 is dead, and for
>> gcc-4.9.0 and binutils-2.23.2 still has h8300, do we still need it for
>&g
it still valuable to send these
bugs to Bugzilla (although it is found under Linux)?
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
18 matches
Mail list logo
