ect I'm not
the only one in that situation.
The fact that there has been little response to the ARM Summit doesn't
mean that nobody cares or that the problems seem to large to solve.
It just means that we're going to have to find a different way to get
this work done.
b.g.
--
Bill Gatliff
b...@billgatliff.com
Gerald:
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Bill Gatliff wrote:
Indeed, "bitrotted" is in fact a better description of what is happening.
I have tweaked the ChangeLog entry to say "gone", which is even more
neutral, and will do the same on the 4.1 bra
etely agree.
I recommend that we dispense with the FAQ altogether and put what we
know into the gcc wiki. The closer we work with the gcc team, the more
likely it is that they will continue to support us.
b.g.
--
Bill Gatliff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 off the top of my head) it became clear that it had fallen into
disrepair, and Bill Gatliff, who was then and is now an active and valuable
contributing member of the crossgcc community, volunteered to take it over.
He then actively maintained it for several years and it was only when his
websit
