something like that (or for example
extending checking the non-null attribute to more than rejecting
NULL-constants but also variables that are always NULL) and you need
testers let me know.
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
?
And how are classes and parent classes made compatible in C++? Is the
front end always making a implicit type conversion or are they 'equivalent'
in one direction?
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
--
"Never contain programs so few bugs, as when no debugging tools are available!"
Niklaus Wirth
t;scripts used to control compilation and installation of the
executable" and thus need to be available under GPL-compatible terms.
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
l rules for access through 'char').
But only in that example. In general memcpy might be optimized to some
assignment causing a SIGBUS if gcc thinks it is save but it is not.
(like a misaligned pointer to a struct where some member is accessed).
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
this is he result of "more clever", but mostly a side effect of
better inlining that was not followed by making the warning code
better to cope with such inlining.
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
u have such a policy from
the start).
It also has suprisingly few false positives, once one
#define __builtin_expect(a,b) (a)
#define __builtin_constant_p(a) (__builtin_constant_p(a) != 0)
and encapsulates all ctype.h functions...
Hochachtungsvoll,
sed will be errors. (The same with sizeof(void), which most likely
only happens with p=malloc(sizeof(*p)) from macros).
Is there already a warning against that (I cannot find any in the info
page) or is there any chance to get such a thing implemented?
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
nse of the word 'correct'
range for those functions, or in any way sensible range for
computations of those. Code like
"if( x+y < 2*pi) return sin(x+y); else return(x+y-2*pi);" would
really be useable to make me run around screaming, but
naming any range smaller than some [-50pi,100pi] "valid" could
really make me crazy...
Bernhard R. Link
ul definitions of sine for real
> numbers outside "(co)sine related ranges", and that these definitions
> are frequently used.
What are "(co)sine related ranges", if I may ask? Have you any sane
definiton than 'values in a range I personaly like'?
Bernhard R. Link
