Will be it clean the GCC 4.3 branch's plan?
* Cleaner TreeSSA?
* Cleaner MemSSA?
* Cleaner RTL?
* Cleaner Vectorizing?
* Tail Call?
Best regards
Obtenga su E-mail GRATUITO en http://www.clanomega.com
___
Get your own Web-based E-mail Servi
The snapshot gcc-4.2.0-20060909 compiles jikes-1.22. It's OK.
Thanks Andrew Pinski
Obtenga su E-mail GRATUITO en http://www.clanomega.com
___
Get your own Web-based E-mail Service at http://www.zzn.com
The snapshot gcc-4.2.0-20060902 stops compiling jikes-1.22.tar.bz2.
The snapshot gcc-4.2.0-20060906 stops compiling jikes-1.22.tar.bz2 too.
It doesn't ocurr with gcc-3.3.6, gcc-4.1.2-20060901 and
gcc-4.0.4-20060831, they are OK.
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i486-slackware-linux
Configu
The snapshot gcc-4.2.0-20060902 stops compiling jikes-1.22.tar.bz2.
It doesn't ocurr with gcc-3.3.6, gcc-4.1.2-20060901 and
gcc-4.0.4-20060831, they are OK.
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i486-slackware-linux
Configured with: ./configure --prefix=/tools/gcc42 --enable-shared
--enable-thr
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
| > Why is GCC-4.2.x missing -march=k8 -mtune=athlonxp -mtune=athlon-xp
| > -mtune=athlon_xp -msse3 -m3dnow+ -m32?
|
| I don't think we should have variants for all sorts of spellings
| such as athlonxp vs athlon-xp vs athlon_xp.
The big problem is that none of these work! I
Andrew Pinski wrote:
| | Why is the table gcc/config/i386/i386.c:processor_alias_table[]
small and unextendable?
| |
| What do you mean by unextendable? I just tried to extend it and it
worked.
|
Is it true? The truth is half.
gcc$ for cpu in dothan sonoma sempron venice winchester palermo mero
Why is GCC-4.2.x missing -march=sempron -mtune=sempron -msse3 -m3dnow+?
Why is GCC-4.2.x missing -march=k8 -mtune=athlonxp -mtune=athlon-xp
-mtune=athlon_xp -msse3 -m3dnow+ -m32?
Why is the table gcc/config/i386/i386.c:processor_alias_table[] small
and unextendable?
GCC want to say me bad news f
i386.md from GCC-4.1.1-RC1 and GCC-4.2-ss has bugs!
i386.md from GCC-4.1.1-RC1 has the sharp symbol '#':
"f#x,x#f", "f#x,xm#f", "f#rx,..#fx,..#rf", ...
i386.md from GCC-4.2-ss has corrected it and has not the sharp symbol '#':
"f,x", "f,xm", ...
What is the meaning of repeated words in i386.md?
ss complex than GCC-4.x.
Best regards, Anny Blackyew