Er, well, I missed to tell what I did to the branch:
- rebased to current master,
- reverted a squashed commit, and
- applied 8 separate commits.
So nothing spectacular. Nothing I would expect anything to chew on for so long.
- Andre
On Tue, 2 Sep 2025 11:39:18 +0200
Andre Vehreschild wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2025 11:00:41 +0100
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sept 2025 at 10:47, Andre Vehreschild via Gcc
> wrote:
> >
> > Er, well, I missed to tell what I did to the branch:
> >
> > - rebased to current master,
> > - reverted a squashed commit,
Ok, terminated here.
Sorry for blocking the whole repo for so long. I didn't know.
Regards,
Andre
On Tue, 2 Sep 2025 11:42:24 +0200
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 11:39:18AM +0200, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> > Hi Jakub,
> >
> > I am pushing to gfortran-test. The proces
Hi Jakub,
I am pushing to gfortran-test. The process seems to be finished, but is not
returning (sorry it's in German):
Objekte aufzählen: 11679, fertig.
Zähle Objekte: 100% (11679/11679), fertig.
Delta-Kompression verwendet bis zu 28 Threads.
Komprimiere Objekte: 100% (2995/2995), fertig.
Schrei
Hi all,
I don't like the new keyword. Could we do "stdcomp" (for "standard compliant")
or something like that? When a keyword allows a question mark, I would even add
that, i.e.. like "stdcomp?". Or when we like to go with interp then at least
add "std", i.e. "stdinterp". "interp" alone to me is t
