y this again.
At least, I don't need to look in the mirror to see someone barking.
Can we have a normal discussion please ? Try to become a mature human
being.
Adriaan van Os
issues and others can be resolved for the
benefit of all.
This is an excellent résumé of the situation.
Thanks,
Adriaan van Os
Steven Bosscher wrote:
Adriaan van Os <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The
answer is that simply the resources fail to maintain gpc on a daily
basis on gcc mainline.
It seems to me that integrating gpc would _reduce_ the burden on the
gpc team, because you would get more regular testing
gcc bugs are not always fixed.
Apropos, <http://gcc.gnu.org/backends.html> seems to be pointing to
the wrong page now.
Sorry, it isn't, I mixed up "front-end" and "back-end".
Sincerely,
Adriaan van Os
te a
branch, so I am looking for a gcc maintainer to approve for write
access (solely for the branch). I signed an FSF assignment for the GNU
Pascal compiler on February 15, 2005 (OS/RT 220644).
Sincerely,
Adriaan van Os
<http://www.microbizz.nl/gpc.html>
nd very old) bugs are
retargeted (if they were ever targeted at all), but also the new
"regression" bugs ? Sic transit gloria mundi ! Interestingly, one could
argue that a retargeted (and thus unfixed) regression bug is no longer
a regression bug, because it no longer "previously worked"
Sincerely,
Adriaan van Os
