by this way, I have no
objection. :)
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj
roach can
encourage more people to involve in helping GCC better. What do you think?
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj
k at it?
Maybe you can ask GCC C++ frontend developers (see
${SOURCE}/MAINTAINERS) directly. Perhaps they can tell
you where to start to fix the problem. :-)
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
ail-archive.com/gcc@gcc.gnu.org/msg58152.html
[2] http://markmail.org/thread/a2ze4v7o4ez64xmd
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
bytecode into the object
file, and what I (binary translator) want is not so high-level
information.
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
hould be the same in this case, right? Although I am
not 100%
sure if they do exactly what the comments say. ;-)
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
> Sure: the document source is gcc/doc/cfg.texi. Thanks.
Already sent to gcc-patches. :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01003.html
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2
endent_reorg,
> which is what a backend (in config/*) calls
> TARGET_MACHINE_DEPENDENT_REORG.
Which means if config/arch does NOT define TARGET_MACHINE_DEPENDENT_REORG
, then pass_machine_reorg does NOTHING for that arch. Am I right?
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems
r delayed-branch scheduling. And
you said it depends on particular target. Did you mean those architectures
have branch delay slot, like those listed in the comments in gcc/reorg.c?
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiw
his implies we have to do some magic as the CFG can simultaneously
consist of basic blocks containing RTL and GIMPLE trees."
Is there a way for me to correct the document? Thanks!
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
CFG the same as the one in the assembly? I mean
if I analysis the assembly and contruct the CFG back, they
are the same?
Thanks.
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
in the tree
representation is discarded before expanding to RTL. Long term the CFG
should be maintained and "expanded" to the RTL representation along
with the function tree itself."
Does this mean in the end of GCC compilation, the CFG information is
lost? Thanks!
Regards,
che
Fwd to the list.
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
--- Begin Message ---
I think you can try to modify the assembler to extend the assemble
syntax to encoding the info (such as add some
don't know if this
is the correct way to do so.
Any idea? Thanks.
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
tion such as CFG in a similar way as register
usage does?
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
"the hard part" you mean is how to insert that
information into executable directly without using something like
`objcopy`. Is that right?
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
with its corresponding binary (virtual) address.
Thanks.
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
Hi, Ian
I found a gcc plugin called gcc-vcg-plugin
(http://code.google.com/p/gcc-vcg-plugin/). I am not sure
if this can be a start point.
Any comments? Thanks.
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C
inary (virtual) address.
If it is possible to generating such information, which
part of gcc should I look into first?
Thanks!
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
19 matches
Mail list logo
