P.S. to: scan-*-dump-times across multiple functions considered harmful

2025-07-01 Thread Joern Wolfgang Rennecke
P.S.: to get get the specifity of linenumbers without the brittleness, we could have a pragma for the extra dump line tag instead. Either till the next such pragme / EOF, or (if before next such pragma), till the end of function. Disadvantages: Not actually more specific when the source describ

scan-*-dump-times across multiple functions considered harmful

2025-07-01 Thread Joern Wolfgang Rennecke
Quite often I see a test quickly written to test some new feature (bug fix, extension or optimization) that has a couple of functions to cover various aspects of the feature, checked all together with a single scan-tree-dump-times, scan-rtl-dump-times etc. check, using the expected value for th

smtgcc mid-year update

2025-07-01 Thread Krister Walfridsson via Gcc
I have continued working on my translation validator, smtgcc [1]. Here is an update of what I have done since the end-of-year update. smtgcc-tv-backend - The main focus has been improving the smtgcc-tv-backend tool which checks that the generated assembly is a refinement of the

Re: Criteria for adding AIX as a secondary platform.

2025-07-01 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 09:44:50PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > Some years ago (well, 5+ honestly) I was using I think 119 to help > > figure out some endian-specific bugs in a patch I was working on. It > > is slightly worrying if AIX/power support has bitrotted due to it > > being kicked off t

Re: Criteria for adding AIX as a secondary platform.

2025-07-01 Thread Janne Blomqvist via Gcc
On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 8:59 AM Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote: > > Am 30.06.25 um 20:47 schrieb Jonathan Wakely via Gcc: > > On Mon, 30 Jun 2025, 17:13 Thomas Koenig via Gcc, wrote: > > > >> Am 30.06.25 um 17:17 schrieb Richard Biener via Gcc: > >>> There used to be access to an AIX system on the co

Re: Criteria for adding AIX as a secondary platform.

2025-07-01 Thread Eric Botcazou
> Some years ago (well, 5+ honestly) I was using I think 119 to help > figure out some endian-specific bugs in a patch I was working on. It > is slightly worrying if AIX/power support has bitrotted due to it > being kicked off the primary/secondary platforms list, are there any > other reasonably p

Re: Criteria for adding AIX as a secondary platform.

2025-07-01 Thread Andrew Pinski via Gcc
On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 10:31 AM swamy sangamesh via Gcc wrote: > > Thank you all for your response. > > I would be posting regression test results regularly and will work on > setting up a buildbot for AIX. > > I can see that currently the AIX build is broken with the below error. > > In file incl

Re: Criteria for adding AIX as a secondary platform.

2025-07-01 Thread swamy sangamesh via Gcc
Thank you all for your response. I would be posting regression test results regularly and will work on setting up a buildbot for AIX. I can see that currently the AIX build is broken with the below error. In file included from ./tm.h:25, from /opt/freeware/src/packages/BUILD/gcc

Re: Criteria for adding AIX as a secondary platform.

2025-07-01 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 1:59 AM Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote: > Am 30.06.25 um 20:47 schrieb Jonathan Wakely via Gcc: > > On Mon, 30 Jun 2025, 17:13 Thomas Koenig via Gcc, > wrote: > > > >> Am 30.06.25 um 17:17 schrieb Richard Biener via Gcc: > >>> There used to be access to an AIX system on the c