On 6/3/25 1:41 PM, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote:
What is not working with the current system? What is this fixing?
It relies on the someone to shepherd the process and it's something that
often gets pushed down on my daily todo list. As a result nominations
don't happen or are extremely
On 6/3/25 4:16 AM, Richard Sandiford via Gcc wrote:
Hi,
At the moment, all reviewers and maintainers have to be appointed by the
Steering Committee. I wonder if we could add a second, more community-based
route: someone can be appointed as a reviewer or maintainer with the agreement
of a giv
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 11:47:41AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 at 11:21, Richard Sandiford via Gcc
> wrote:
> > At the moment, all reviewers and maintainers have to be appointed by the
> > Steering Committee. I wonder if we could add a second, more community-b
Snapshot gcc-12-20250604 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/12-20250604/
and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 12 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 at 16:43, Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc wrote:
>
> Jerry D writes:
>
> > I am getting this tonight.
> > [...]
> > 257 | __gthread_cond_t _M_cond = __GTHREAD_COND_INIT;
>
> By the way, you can scan the sourceware.org buildbots, which include a
> broadish coverage of architectur
Jerry D writes:
> I am getting this tonight.
> [...]
> 257 | __gthread_cond_t _M_cond = __GTHREAD_COND_INIT;
By the way, you can scan the sourceware.org buildbots, which include a
broadish coverage of architectures and distros. Broken builds show up
pretty obviously both in the builds and
On 04/06/2025 14:57, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 5:24 AM Richard Earnshaw (lists)
mailto:richard.earns...@arm.com>> wrote:
On 03/06/2025 20:41, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 3:23 PM Richard Sandiford
mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com>>
I bootstrapped and tested on Power8 and Power9 BE in both 32-bit and
64-bit modes, and on Power8, Power9 & Power10 LE in 64-bit mode, and
everything looks good.
On 30/05/25 9:16 pm, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
> The second release candidate for GCC 13.4 is available from
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org
On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 5:24 AM Richard Earnshaw (lists) <
richard.earns...@arm.com> wrote:
> On 03/06/2025 20:41, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 3:23 PM Richard Sandiford <
> richard.sandif...@arm.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> David Edelsohn writes:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2025
On 03/06/2025 20:41, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 3:23 PM Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>
>> David Edelsohn writes:
>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 6:22 AM Richard Sandiford via Gcc <
>> gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
Hi,
At the moment, all reviewers and maintai
On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 10:46 PM Richard Sandiford via Gcc
wrote:
>
> David Edelsohn via Gcc writes:
> > On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 3:23 PM Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >
> >> David Edelsohn writes:
> >> > On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 6:22 AM Richard Sandiford via Gcc <
> >> gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
> >> > wrot
11 matches
Mail list logo
