Am Dienstag, dem 12.11.2024 um 07:51 +0100 schrieb Martin Uecker:
> Am Montag, dem 07.10.2024 um 15:14 + schrieb Qing Zhao:
> >
> > > On Oct 7, 2024, at 10:13, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 12:42:24AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > > * Joseph Myers:
> >
Am Montag, dem 07.10.2024 um 15:14 + schrieb Qing Zhao:
>
> > On Oct 7, 2024, at 10:13, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 12:42:24AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > * Joseph Myers:
> > >
> > > > The real question is how to achieve optimal warnings in the absenc
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek
> Sent: 04 November 2024 21:44
> To: Prathamesh Kulkarni
> Cc: Richard Biener ; Richard Biener
> ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Thomas Schwinge
>
> Subject: Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx
>
> External email: Use caution opening links or
Dear GCC
I am running docker to build a GCC image for C++ compile. But the image
call the ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc, may I know the reason for this?
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024, Sad Clouds via Gcc wrote:
> Even though there is nothing unsafe here and comparison to floating
> point 0.0 value is well defined.
The point of the warning is that *if you are writing code that thinks of
floating-point values as being approximations to real numbers* then such
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024, Martin Uecker via Gcc wrote:
> BTW: My main practical issue with zero-sized arrays is that the
> UB sanitizers triggers for zero-sized variable arrays.
They are after all UB in standard C. (Note for example that the UB
sanitizers cover all cases of shifts that are undefined
