Hi lain,
Thanks for your thoughtful comments and concerns. The primary goal of
compressing the structure fields is to achieve memory efficiency. I
understand your points regarding potential issues with modifying the
size and types of the structure. I guess rewriting all the
corresponding statement
Snapshot gcc-13-20240113 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/13-20240113/
and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 13 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 4:50 PM Dan Klishch wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In the discussion of LLVM's PR adding `[[gnu::gcc_struct]]` support to Clang
> (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71148), maintainers asked
> me to make sure that whatever
> is done there, makes sense for GCC too.
>
> To summari
This commit
commit 8abddb187b33480d8827f44ec655f45734a1749d
Author: Andrew Burgess
Date: Sat Aug 5 14:31:06 2023 +0200
libgcc: support heap-based trampolines
Add support for heap-based trampolines on x86_64-linux, aarch64-linux,
and x86_64-darwin. Implement the __builtin_neste
> On 13 Jan 2024, at 07:45, Hanke Zhang via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm attempting to compress the size of a field in a structure for
> memory-friendly purposes. I created an IPA pass to achieve this, but I
> ran into some issues as follows:
>
> // original
> struct Foo {
> long a1;
> int a2;
>
