On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 2:54 PM Hanke Zhang via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi, I have been very interested in loop fusion recently. I found that
> both LLVM and icc have implemented this optimization. I also noticed
> that gcc does not seem to implement it.
>
> I would like to ask if gcc have any plans to imp
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 11:16:21PM +0200, Martin Uecker wrote:
> I meant something else: Why wasn't an unsigned type
> used in the first place? If all "counter" variables were
> signed and all "modulo" variables unsigned, one could already
> diagnose overflow reliably.
>
> I was trying to unde
Snapshot gcc-13-20230923 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/13-20230923/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 13 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
I'm eventually fixing those tests the same way we manage this problem in
libstdc++ testsuite.
testsuite: Add optional libstdc++ version namespace in expected
diagnostic
When libstdc++ is build with
--enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace diagnostics are
showing this namespace, c
Hi, I have been very interested in loop fusion recently. I found that
both LLVM and icc have implemented this optimization. I also noticed
that gcc does not seem to implement it.
I would like to ask if gcc have any plans to implement this
optimization? In addition, I also found that there is a fun