On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 22:26 +0530, Mir Immad wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Reading through the thread, I feel the following attributes look good
> and
> similar to what I've done:
>
> __attribute__ ((fd_arg(N)))
> __attribute__ ((fd_arg_read(N)))
> __attribute__ ((fd_arg_write(N)))
>
> I believe how
Hi everyone,
Reading through the thread, I feel the following attributes look good and
similar to what I've done:
__attribute__ ((fd_arg(N)))
__attribute__ ((fd_arg_read(N)))
__attribute__ ((fd_arg_write(N)))
I believe how to annotate the glibc headers is a separate discussion.
Dave: From the
On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 16:01 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * David Malcolm:
>
> > On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 14:05 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > * Szabolcs Nagy via Gcc:
> >
> > [adding Immad back to the CC list]
> >
> > >
> > > > to be honest, i'd expect interesting fd bugs to be
> > > > dynam
Oops the ICS file is out of date now. Feel free to use the attached
ics file for the next half of this year if you're using a local
calendar.
The google calendar link remains the same:
https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ical/lm5bddk2krcmtv5iputjgqvoio%40group.calendar.google.com/public/basic.ics
* David Malcolm:
> On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 14:05 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Szabolcs Nagy via Gcc:
>
> [adding Immad back to the CC list]
>
>>
>> > to be honest, i'd expect interesting fd bugs to be
>> > dynamic and not easy to statically analyze.
>> > the use-after-unchecked-open maybe usef
Hi all,
Here is the agenda for tomorrow's RISC-V GNU toolchain meeting. If you have any
topics want to
discuss or share, please let me know and I will add them to the agenda, thanks.
Agenda:
- [RFC] RV64E/lp64e supports
gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-July/59830
On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 14:05 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Szabolcs Nagy via Gcc:
[adding Immad back to the CC list]
>
> > to be honest, i'd expect interesting fd bugs to be
> > dynamic and not easy to statically analyze.
> > the use-after-unchecked-open maybe useful. i would
> > not expect th
On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 09:37 +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> The 07/12/2022 18:25, David Malcolm via Libc-alpha wrote:
> > On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 18:16 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 23:03 +0530, Mir Immad wrote:
> > > GCC's attribute syntax here:
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/on
* Szabolcs Nagy via Gcc:
> to be honest, i'd expect interesting fd bugs to be
> dynamic and not easy to statically analyze.
> the use-after-unchecked-open maybe useful. i would
> not expect the access direction to catch many bugs.
You might be right. But I think the annotations could help to cat
On Jul 13 2022, Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha wrote:
> note that glibc headers have to be namespace clean so it
> would be more like
>
> __attribute__((__fd_argument (__access, 1)))
> __attribute__((__fd_argument (__read, 1)))
> __attribute__((__fd_argument (__write, 1)))
>
> so it would be e
The 07/12/2022 18:25, David Malcolm via Libc-alpha wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 18:16 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 23:03 +0530, Mir Immad wrote:
> > GCC's attribute syntax here:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Attribute-Syntax.html
> > allows for a parenthesized
11 matches
Mail list logo
