Re: libgfortran.so SONAME and powerpc64le-linux ABI changes

2021-10-15 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Thank you for writing this out Bill! On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 08:50:08AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote: > Longer term, we have the question of supporting more Power targets. AIX will > continue to > use only double-double. Yes. So it will be virtually no cost to continue supporting double-double on

gcc-10-20211015 is now available

2021-10-15 Thread GCC Administrator via Gcc
Snapshot gcc-10-20211015 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20211015/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

Re: libgfortran.so SONAME and powerpc64le-linux ABI changes

2021-10-15 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 04:20:49PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > If we do implement double-double support, I think KIND=15 would be better > than KIND=17, it is true that double-double has for certain numbers much > higher precision than IEEE quad, but the precision depends on the numbers > and mos

Re: libgfortran.so SONAME and powerpc64le-linux ABI changes

2021-10-15 Thread Thomas Koenig via Gcc
On 15.10.21 20:11, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 08:05:38PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote: with -mabi=ibmlongdouble, I see 31 and 291, while with -mabi=ieeelongdouble 33 and 4931. The 0.0_8 precision/range values are 15 and 307, so neither precision of C long double if it is doubl

Re: libgfortran.so SONAME and powerpc64le-linux ABI changes

2021-10-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 08:05:38PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote: > > with -mabi=ibmlongdouble, I see 31 and 291, while with -mabi=ieeelongdouble > > 33 and 4931. The 0.0_8 precision/range values are 15 and 307, so neither > > precision of C long double if it is double-double nor range matches > > a

Re: libgfortran.so SONAME and powerpc64le-linux ABI changes

2021-10-15 Thread Thomas Koenig via Gcc
On 15.10.21 16:20, Jakub Jelinek wrote: [...] when one compiles integer function foo () foo = precision (0.0_16) end function foo integer function bar () bar = range (0.0_16) end function bar with -mabi=ibmlongdouble, I see 31 and 291, while with -mabi=ieeelongdouble 33 and 4931. The 0

Re: libgfortran.so SONAME and powerpc64le-linux ABI changes

2021-10-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 08:50:08AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote: > Thanks, Jakub, for starting this discussion, and to everyone who weighed in. > The conversation > went in a number of different directions, so I'd like to summarize my > understanding of points > where I think there was agreement.

Re: libgfortran.so SONAME and powerpc64le-linux ABI changes

2021-10-15 Thread Bill Schmidt via Gcc
Thanks, Jakub, for starting this discussion, and to everyone who weighed in. The conversation went in a number of different directions, so I'd like to summarize my understanding of points where I think there was agreement. I'd also like to separate out short-term considerations for powerpc64le

adc,sbb instruction intrinsics for arm?

2021-10-15 Thread unlvsur unlvsur via Gcc
I want that. Sent from Mail for Windows