Re: daily report on extending static analyzer project [GSoC]

2021-07-06 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc
On Mon, 2021-07-05 at 21:45 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote: > I forgot to send the daily report yesterday, so this one covers the > work done on both days > > AIM : > > - make the analyzer call the function with the updated call-string > representation ( even the ones that doesn’t have a superedge ) >

Re: daily report on extending static analyzer project [GSoC]

2021-07-06 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 18:46 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 20:07 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote: > > AIM for today : > > > > - update the call_stack to track something else other than > > supergraph > > edges > > > > — > > > > PROGRESS : > > > > - After some brainstorming about

Re: daily report on extending static analyzer project [GSoC]

2021-07-06 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 20:07 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote: > AIM for today : > > - update the call_stack to track something else other than supergraph > edges > > — > > PROGRESS : > > - After some brainstorming about tracking the callstack, I think one > better way to track the call stack is to kee

Re: where is PRnnnn required again?

2021-07-06 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Tue, 6 Jul 2021, 22:45 Martin Sebor via Gcc, wrote: > On 7/6/21 3:36 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 03:20:26PM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote: > >> I came away from the recent discussion of ChangeLogs requirements > >> with the impression that the PR bit should be

Re: where is PRnnnn required again?

2021-07-06 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc
On 7/6/21 3:36 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 03:20:26PM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote: I came away from the recent discussion of ChangeLogs requirements with the impression that the PR bit should be in the subject (first) line and also above the ChangeLog part but does

Re: where is PRnnnn required again?

2021-07-06 Thread Marek Polacek via Gcc
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 03:20:26PM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote: > I came away from the recent discussion of ChangeLogs requirements > with the impression that the PR bit should be in the subject > (first) line and also above the ChangeLog part but doesn't need > to be repeated again in th

where is PRnnnn required again?

2021-07-06 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc
I came away from the recent discussion of ChangeLogs requirements with the impression that the PR bit should be in the subject (first) line and also above the ChangeLog part but doesn't need to be repeated again in the ChangeLog entries. But my commit below was rejected last Friday with the s

GCC 11.1.1 Status Report (2021-07-06)

2021-07-06 Thread Richard Biener
Status == The GCC 11 branch is open for regression and documentation fixes. It's time for a GCC 11.2 release and we are aiming for a release candidate in about two weeks which would result in the GCC 11.2 release about three months after GCC 11.1. Two weeks give you ample time to care for i