Snapshot gcc-12-20210606 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/12-20210606/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 12 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
I have a class which is NOT, as far as I can see, polymorphic.
It doesn't inherit from any other class and none of its methods are
declared virtual. The class implementation and all its callers all
compile just fine.
Is there some other way that a class can be thought to be virtual,
stealthily (
On June 6, 2021 12:54:03 AM GMT+02:00, Andrew Pinski via Gcc
wrote:
>While debugging PR 100925, I found that after my match.pd (for
>A?CST0:CST1) and phiopt patch to use match-and-simplify, gcc will
>produce an negate assignment gimple which has a pointer type (and
>offset type). Before we would