I noticed this section on "Backwards Compatibility" in the libstdc++
docs that talks about
- glibc 2.0.x
- GCC 3.2 (August 2002)
- GCC 4.1 (February 2006)
and links to "Migrating to GCC 4.1" and "Migration guide for GCC-3.2"
documents.
Does this still make sense (and serve real users or deve
On 2021-02-01, 3:19 AM, "Martin Liška" wrote:
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
content is safe
On 1/29/21 3:57 PM, Visda.Vokhshoori--- via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hello,
Hi.
>
> With link time optimization the stack usage informatio
On 1/29/21 3:57 PM, Visda.Vokhshoori--- via Gcc wrote:
Hello,
Hi.
With link time optimization the stack usage information is determined during
local transformation and written to program.ltrans0.ltrans.su. There will be
one .su file for each partition.
All ltrans files, including the .s
On 2/1/21 9:00 AM, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
* Thomas Koenig via Gcc:
I had this problem previously, then it was thought that the
messed-up spellling of my name caused this. That has been
fixed by now.
Any ideas what could be going wrong?
On the glibc side, only bug references in the co
* Thomas Koenig via Gcc:
> I had this problem previously, then it was thought that the
> messed-up spellling of my name caused this. That has been
> fixed by now.
>
> Any ideas what could be going wrong?
On the glibc side, only bug references in the commit body, not the
commit subject are picked
