Snapshot gcc-9-20201113 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9-20201113/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 9 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
Hi Simon,
On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 10:41 -0500, Simon Marchi wrote:
> So in the end the logical thing to do when encountering a
> DW_FORM_rnglistx in a split-unit, in order to support everybody, is
> probably to go to the .debug_rnglists.dwo section, if there's one,
> disregarding the (inherited) DW_
On 2020-11-13 10:18 a.m., Mark Wielaard wrote:
> That too, but I was actually referring to the sections that define
> Range List and Location List Tables (7.28 and 7.29) which define the
> meaning of DW_AT_rnglists_base and DW_AT_loclists_base. But you could
> also look at 3.1.3 Split Full Compilat
Hi Simon,
On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 09:45 -0500, Simon Marchi wrote:
> I think I would have asked the question the other way around :) The
> > spec explicitly describes rnglists_base (and loclists_base) as a way
> > to reference ranges (loclists) through the index table, so that the
> > only relocatio
Hello
Hope you and your family are safe !!
Myself Zoe Wilde, Business Analyst of Inside data view.
We would like to follow-up with you for the below mentioned exhibition
attendees' s database.
Expo details
Sensors Expo & Conference
16 - 18 Nov 2020
San Jose Convention Center, San Jose, USA
Cou
On 2020-11-12 7:11 p.m., Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 11:11:43PM -0500, Simon Marchi wrote:
>> I'm currently squashing some bugs related to .debug_rnglists in GDB, and
>> I happened to notice that clang and gcc do different things when
>> generating rnglists with spl
Hi guys,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 09:10:14PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/12/20 7:02 PM, Xionghu Luo via Gcc wrote:
> > The output shows "REQ_EQUAL r118:DI+0x66546b64" is deleted by
> > df_remove_dead_eq_notes,
> > but r120:DI is not REG_DEAD here, so is it correct here to check insn use
> > an
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 09:23:09AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 11/9/20 11:09 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > So I think either new_update must be raising an exception, or returning
> > None for some reason.
> > Bet we want to add logging for that exception, as well as for it returning
> > None and
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> here is updaed patch.
>
> Honza
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, OK (after the fnspec fixes)?
OK.
Thanks,
Richard.
>
> 2020-11-10 Jan Hubicka
>
> * gimple.c: Include ipa-modref-tree.h and ipa-modref.h.
> (gimple_call_arg
