On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 5:21 AM Gary Oblock wrote:
>
> >IPA transforms happens when get_body is called. With LTO this also
> >trigger reading the body from disk. So if you want to see all bodies
> >and work on them, you can simply call get_body on everything but it will
> >result in increased me
>IPA transforms happens when get_body is called. With LTO this also
>trigger reading the body from disk. So if you want to see all bodies
>and work on them, you can simply call get_body on everything but it will
>result in increased memory use since everything will be loaded form disk
>and expand
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 20 2020, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 1:02 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 20 2020, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 7:52 PM Gary Oblock
>> > > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Richard,
>> > >>
>> > >> I guess that will work
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 1:02 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 20 2020, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 7:52 PM Gary Oblock
> > > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Richard,
> > > >>
> > > >> I guess that will work for me. However, since it
> > > >
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 1:02 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 20 2020, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 7:52 PM Gary Oblock
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Richard,
> > >>
> > >> I guess that will work for me. However, since it
> > >> was decided to remove
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 1:02 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 20 2020, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 7:52 PM Gary Oblock
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Richard,
> >>
> >> I guess that will work for me. However, since it
> >> was decided to remove an identical function,
>
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 20 2020, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 7:52 PM Gary Oblock wrote:
>>
>> Richard,
>>
>> I guess that will work for me. However, since it
>> was decided to remove an identical function,
>> why weren't the calls to it adjusted to reflect it?
>> If the call wasn't tr
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 7:52 PM Gary Oblock wrote:
>
> Richard,
>
> I guess that will work for me. However, since it
> was decided to remove an identical function,
> why weren't the calls to it adjusted to reflect it?
> If the call wasn't transformed that means it will
> be mapped at some later ti