Snapshot gcc-9-20200731 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9-20200731/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 9 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
> I see check-gnat in some of the makefile input files but I do not see it
> in the ones that are built. Is there something needed to specify when
> configure is run to get it included?
No, this works with some generic magic like for gcc; g++, gfortran and so on.
--
Eric Botcazou
On 7/31/20 7:57 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Is there a way to run a single ada test? The documentation mentions hows to
"run a subset of the tests by specifying which chapter to run" but not
individual tests. I tried this (and some variations)
make -k check-ada RUNTESTFLAGS=gnat.exp=gnat.dg/opt
On 7/22/20 6:34 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jan Beulich:
>
>> On 21.07.2020 20:04, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * Premachandra Mallappa:
>>>
[AMD Public Use]
Hi Floarian,
> I'm including a proposal for the levels below. I use single
> letters for them, but I expect t
On 7/22/20 5:26 AM, Richard Biener via Libc-alpha wrote:
> So for the bike-shedding I indeed think x86-10{0,1,2,3}
> or x86-{A,B,C,..}, eventually duplicating as x86_64- as
> suggested by Jan is better than x86-2014 or x86-avx2.
Agreed. If we really want to be clear, call it a "level"
or something
> Is there a way to run a single ada test? The documentation mentions hows to
> "run a subset of the tests by specifying which chapter to run" but not
> individual tests. I tried this (and some variations)
>
> make -k check-ada RUNTESTFLAGS=gnat.exp=gnat.dg/opt86a.adb
>
> but it ran a whole bun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
A reminder that today (31 July 2020) is the deadline for submitting
talks, lightning talks, BoFs or developer tutorials for the GNU Tools
track at LPC 2020.
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/linuxplumbers2020
The program committee will be sorting t
