RE: [QUESTION] About RTL optimization at forward propagation

2020-03-30 Thread xiezhiheng
> -Original Message- > From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 4:39 PM > To: xiezhiheng > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [QUESTION] About RTL optimization at forward propagation > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 4:19 AM xiezhiheng > wrote: >

Re: Question about git: merging to gccgo branch

2020-03-30 Thread Joseph Myers
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020, Ian Lance Taylor via Gcc wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:54 AM Joseph Myers wrote: > > > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020, Martin Liška wrote: > > > > > Can you please disable email sending for user branch? Or does it make any > > > sense? > > > > Email sending for user branches mak

Re: Question about git: merging to gccgo branch

2020-03-30 Thread Ian Lance Taylor via Gcc
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:54 AM Joseph Myers wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020, Martin Liška wrote: > > > Can you please disable email sending for user branch? Or does it make any > > sense? > > Email sending for user branches makes perfect sense, to make visible the > development going on. It's sp

Re: Can we please have the old mailing list back

2020-03-30 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc
On Sat, 2020-03-28 at 18:46 +, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Fri, 27 Mar 2020, Jeff Law via Gcc wrote: > > > As an ex IT guy, I've gone both directions depending on the project I was > > supporting and certainly see the pros and cons of going highly customized vs > > as > > generic as possible

Re: Question about git: merging to gccgo branch

2020-03-30 Thread Joseph Myers
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020, Martin Liška wrote: > Can you please disable email sending for user branch? Or does it make any > sense? Email sending for user branches makes perfect sense, to make visible the development going on. It's specifically email sending for merges of commits already present in

Re: -stdlib=libc++?

2020-03-30 Thread Iain Sandoe
unlvsur unlvsur via Gcc wrote: I think this would be great to support LLVM’s libc++ by be compatible with -stdlib=libc++ on clang. I have a patch for this, for next stage 1. (we are in stage 4 now, so not the right time for new features). thanks Iain

-stdlib=libc++?

2020-03-30 Thread unlvsur unlvsur via Gcc
I think this would be great to support LLVM’s libc++ by be compatible with -stdlib=libc++ on clang. Sent from Mail for Windows 10

Re: GSoC: Implementation of OMPD

2020-03-30 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
Hi! I appreciate you are interested in this GSoC topic! On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 09:18:50PM -0400, y2s1982 . via Gcc wrote: > > The OMPD project idea might be the most ambitious from the whole lot. > > Basically, the goal is to come up with a prototype implementation of > > chapter 5 of OpenMP 5.0

Re: Question about git: merging to gccgo branch

2020-03-30 Thread Martin Liška
On 1/22/20 7:38 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: I don't want to send 581 e-mails. I would be happy not sending any e-mails at all. I would also be happy sending 1 e-mail. This is the issue we've discussed in

Re: [QUESTION] About RTL optimization at forward propagation

2020-03-30 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 4:19 AM xiezhiheng wrote: > > Hi, > I find there exists some restricts in function fwprop preventing it to > forward propagate addresses into loops. > /* Go through all the uses. df_uses_create will create new ones at the >end, and we'll go through them as well. > >