On 2020-03-24, H.J. Lu via Binutils wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:02 AM Gunther Nikl wrote:
Dear GCC developers!
I just noticed that the server migration for GCC and sourceware.org
brought a surprising change: The list archives are now provided with
mailman. Maybe its only me, but IMO w
Hi,
I do not want to start a flame war.
I just am curious what was the reason why
the old system cannot be used any more?
Would there be a possibility to get the old look-and-feel back?
Thanks
Bernd.
Hello Martin,
I have replied in-line.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 7:36 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> sorry for a late reply, things are a bit crazy recently.
>
That's okay. Thanks for reaching back to me. I am still very interested.
> On Sat, Mar 07 2020, y2s1982 . wrote:
> > Hello ever
Hi Tony,
sorry for a late reply, things are a bit crazy recently.
On Sat, Mar 07 2020, y2s1982 . wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> My name is Tony Sim. In anticipation to planning for my last summer within
> my degree program, I am considering to take part in the Google Summer of
> Codes. In particul
Hi Nader,
On Tue, Mar 24 2020, Nader Al Awar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am a master's student at UT Austin and I am interested in working on
> extending the static analysis pass project as part of GSoC.
> Specifically, I'm interested in both adding C++ support for new/delete
> and adding plugin support
On Tue, 2020-03-24 at 10:18 -0500, Nader Al Awar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am a master's student at UT Austin and I am interested in working
> on
> extending the static analysis pass project as part of GSoC.
Hello, I'm the author/maintainer of the static analysis pass, and would
be the mentor for the
Hi -
> [...]
> On a related note, contribute.html has a link to
> https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/contrib/check_GNU_style.sh?view=markup
> and gcc-4.8/changes.html has a linkto
> https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/libgfortran/libgfortran.h?content-type=text%2Fplain&view=co
> which are broken
Hi, all.
I am updating the timeline, since it was shifted due to SARS-CoV-2. Here
is the updated version:
- Week \[1, 4\] -- May 4 to May 27:\
Update `cc1`, `cc1plus`, `f771`, ..., to partition the Compilation
Unit (CU) after IPA analysis directly into multiple LTRANS
partitions, in
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Frank Ch. Eigler via Overseers wrote:
> Both svn: and ssh+svn: now work for your archeological needs.
> Further, URLs such as
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279160&root=gcc&view=rev
> https://gcc.gnu.org/r123456
>
> are mapped to gitweb searches that try to locate the ma
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:02 AM Gunther Nikl wrote:
>
> Dear GCC developers!
>
> I just noticed that the server migration for GCC and sourceware.org
> brought a surprising change: The list archives are now provided with
> mailman. Maybe its only me, but IMO with this change the list archives
Sam
Dear GCC developers!
I just noticed that the server migration for GCC and sourceware.org
brought a surprising change: The list archives are now provided with
mailman. Maybe its only me, but IMO with this change the list archives
loose much usability. Eg. the old date sorting had the date as a
head
On March 24, 2020 5:45:05 PM GMT+01:00, Roger Martz via Gcc
wrote:
>I was glad to see that compiler flags such as -fopt-info-vec-missed ...
>provide information about what is happening under the hood w.r.t code
>that
>can and can't be vectorized.
>
>Can anyone point me to a document, etc. that wo
On 3/24/20 12:06 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>> Thanks for working on this!!! However, I still see at least one issue
>> in the following bugzilla entry:
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94123#c4
>>
>> The first two git style links work, but the last one which points
>> to th
Hi -
> Thanks for working on this!!! However, I still see at least one issue
> in the following bugzilla entry:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94123#c4
>
> The first two git style links work, but the last one which points
> to the SVN revision doesn't. Is that a bug in th
On 3/20/20 12:37 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Both svn: and ssh+svn: now work for your archeological needs.
> Further, URLs such as
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279160&root=gcc&view=rev
> https://gcc.gnu.org/r123456
>
> are mapped to gitweb searches that try to locate th
I was glad to see that compiler flags such as -fopt-info-vec-missed ...
provide information about what is happening under the hood w.r.t code that
can and can't be vectorized.
Can anyone point me to a document, etc. that would be helpful in
understanding what the messages output from the compiler
Hello,
I am a master's student at UT Austin and I am interested in working on
extending the static analysis pass project as part of GSoC.
Specifically, I'm interested in both adding C++ support for new/delete
and adding plugin support.
Most of my background is in software engineering and testing:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
> Hi, Richi
>
> On 03/18, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, all
> > >
> > > I have applied some revews to the project. Please see the new proposal
> > > here:
> >
> > Looks good, some editorial
18 matches
Mail list logo
