Greetings All,
Unfortunately due to me being rather busy with school and other things I
will not be able to post my article to the wiki for awhile. However
there is a rough draft here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1po_RRgSCtRyYgMHjV0itW8iOzJXpTdHYIpC9gUMjOxk/edit
that may change a littl
On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> This has the effect that e.g. after
>
> -ffast-math -fno-finite-math-only
>
> the __FAST_MATH__ macro is no longer predefined, but after
>
> -ffast-math -fno-associative-math
>
> the __FAST_MATH__ macro still *is* predefined, even though both
>
Hello,
the -ffast-math command line option sets a bunch of other flags
internally, as implemented in set_fast_math_flags. It is possible
to selectively override those flags on the command line as well.
I'm now wondering under what circumstances the __FAST_MATH__ macro
should still be defined. T
On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> If you have further updates to that page, please go ahead and
>> simply make them (or let me know).
> It still says "The following SVN commands are ..."
Yes, that's another piece I'll tackle today/tomorrow.
>> Also contrib/reghunt appears in need of
On Sat, 18 Jan 2020, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> Why the diff? I don't remember the absence of a diff being a
> problem in the svn era (or at least wasn't argued much on the
> mailing lists).
I think the diffs are nice to have there (as for binutils-gdb and glibc)
for following the development
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 13:07, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020, Gerald Pfeifer wrote (on gcc-patches@):
> > With Git a clone carries the whole repository, so remove instructions
> > on obtaining a local copy of the repository and related instructions
> > on SVN usage.
>
> I just update
Mail Quota: (99% Full)
The size limit of 4096 MB for mailbox gcc@gcc.gnu.org
has been exceeded. Incoming mail is currently being rejected. To upgrade for
more Megabytes [MB].
Upgrade Email Quota
Note: This upgrade is required immediately after receiving this messa
[ Please do reply to me when you reply to my mails. Maybe gmane did that?
Yet Another reason not to use gmane. ]
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 11:04:12PM +0100, Julien _FrnchFrgg_ Rivaud wrote:
> Le 18/01/2020 à 18:49, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> >If a branch does rebase all people who commit to i
On Sat, 18 Jan 2020, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Should gcc-cvs really be listed there still?
Yes, it should. The CVS repository was useful for fixing up cvs2svn
branchpoints in the conversion to git; no doubt it may be useful for
further fixes in any future move to any version control system that
