Hi Guys,
Sorry I switched off the email for the holidays.
I guess the problem with the linker error is, we have a distributed
build system with the linking occurring at the very end of the build
(we have a slow build, that's a different problem though).
So it's compile time that this would be pr
Thanks David,
I'll give it a try. By the way, I'm trying to force one partition
with "-flto-partition=one" I'm not sure if that makes a difference.
Gary
From: David Malcolm
Sent: Friday, January 3, 2020 3:52 PM
To: Gary Oblock ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [EXT]
On Fri, 2020-01-03 at 23:02 +, Gary Oblock wrote:
> I'm having some grief attempting to get at the local definitions
> in LTO (more about the options used later.)
>
> Here's the sequence of code in my optimization (part of attempt
> at structure reorganization optimizations.)
>
> cgraph_nod
I'm having some grief attempting to get at the local definitions
in LTO (more about the options used later.)
Here's the sequence of code in my optimization (part of attempt
at structure reorganization optimizations.)
cgraph_node* node;
FOR_EACH_FUNCTION_WITH_GIMPLE_BODY ( node)
{
tree d
Snapshot gcc-8-20200103 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20200103/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-8
On 2019-12-24 2:37 a.m., Richard Biener wrote:
> On December 23, 2019 6:30:31 PM GMT+01:00, Erick Ochoa
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am working on an LTO pass which drops unused fields on structs. On my
>> tests, I found that the gimple generated for `sizeof` is a constant.
>> For
>> example, for t
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019, Joseph Myers wrote:
> Two more.
>
> git+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/home/gccadmin/gcc-reposurgeon-6a.git
> git+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/home/gccadmin/gcc-reposurgeon-6b.git
Two more.
git+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/home/gccadmin/gcc-reposurgeon-7a.git
git+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/home/gccadmin/gcc-reposurge
