On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 03:41:13PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/28/19 2:27 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 01:40:03PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> >> On 10/25/19 6:01 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> >>> Jason, Jonathan - is the situation on the terrain really that dire that
>
| -Original Message-
| From: Andrew Pinski
| Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 2:52 PM
| To: Jakub Jelinek
| Cc: Jeff Law ; Segher Boessenkool
| ; Gabriel Dos Reis ;
| Andrew Dean ; David Malcolm
| ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de;
| mikest...@comcast.net; ja...@redhat.com;
On 10/28/19 3:52 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:47 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 03:41:13PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 10/28/19 2:27 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 01:40:03PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/25/19 6:01
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:47 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 03:41:13PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 10/28/19 2:27 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 01:40:03PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > >> On 10/25/19 6:01 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> > >>> Jason, J
Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/28/19 2:27 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 01:40:03PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 10/25/19 6:01 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Jason, Jonathan - is the situation on the terrain really that dire that
C++11 (or C++14) isn't at all available
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 03:41:13PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/28/19 2:27 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 01:40:03PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> >> On 10/25/19 6:01 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> >>> Jason, Jonathan - is the situation on the terrain really that dire that
>
On 10/28/19 2:27 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 01:40:03PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 10/25/19 6:01 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>>> Jason, Jonathan - is the situation on the terrain really that dire that
>>> C++11 (or C++14) isn't at all available for platforms that GCC
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 01:40:03PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/25/19 6:01 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> > Jason, Jonathan - is the situation on the terrain really that dire that
> > C++11 (or C++14) isn't at all available for platforms that GCC is
> > bootstrapped from?
> The argument that I'd
| -Original Message-
| From: Jeff Law
| Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 12:44 PM
| To: Richard Biener ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org;
| Gabriel Dos Reis ; Andrew Dean
| ; David Malcolm ;
| r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de; mikest...@comcast.net;
| ja...@redhat.com; Jonathan Wakely
| Subject: Re: GCC selft
On 10/28/19 1:42 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> I'd really like to see us move to C++11 or beyond. Sadly, I don't
>> think
>> we have any good mechanism for making this kind of technical decision
>> when there isn't consensus.
>
> Well, we just do it?
For some reason I thought you were against s
On October 28, 2019 8:40:03 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law wrote:
>On 10/25/19 6:01 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>> [Andrew]
>>
>> | > GCC has some rather unique requirements, in that we support a
>great many
>> | > build configurations, some of which are rather primitive - for
>example,
>> | > requiring
On 10/25/19 6:01 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> [Andrew]
>
> | > GCC has some rather unique requirements, in that we support a great many
> | > build configurations, some of which are rather primitive - for example,
> | > requiring just C++98 with exceptions disabled, in that we want to be able
>
Testresults can be found here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2019-10/msg01742.html
Complete bootstrapo and testsuite logs are here:
https://cloud.emrich-ebersheim.de/index.php/s/g9D245XdCW6GD5W?path=%2F7.4.1-rev.277503
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
13 matches
Mail list logo
