On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 08:51:51PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> Can you just zero memory and remove the explicit setting
> of the terminating '\0'?
>
> q = buffer;
> memset(q, 0, len);
>
(may be dup)
Upon further reading of the code, does buffer have
8*len+1 length? You would need to do
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 08:40:29PM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> Copying gcc list for additional thoughts on a possible bogus warning.
>
> On 9/29/19 9:02 AM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> --- snip ---
>
> > diff --git a/libgfortran/io/write.c b/libgfortran/io/write.c
> > index 4ef35561
Copying gcc list for additional thoughts on a possible bogus warning.
On 9/29/19 9:02 AM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
Hi all,
--- snip ---
diff --git a/libgfortran/io/write.c b/libgfortran/io/write.c
index 4ef35561fdd..fc046efbe34 100644
--- a/libgfortran/io/write.c
+++ b/libgfortran/io/write.c
@@
As far as I can tell from the discussion, people are happy with the
version of the conversion using @gcc.gnu.org addresses. When shall we (do
a final conversion if there are any commits postdating that one and)
switch over to it as the live repository, set up hooks and update
documentation of
On September 30, 2019 3:52:52 PM GMT+02:00, Szabolcs Nagy
wrote:
>On 27/09/2019 20:23, GT wrote:
>> I am attempting to create a vector version of sincos for PPC64.
>> The relevant discussion thread is on the GLIBC libc-alpha mailing
>list.
>> Navigate it beginning at
>https://sourceware.org/ml/li
On 30/09/2019 18:30, GT wrote:
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Monday, September 30, 2019 9:52 AM, Szabolcs Nagy
> wrote:
>
>> On 27/09/2019 20:23, GT wrote:
>>
>>> I am attempting to create a vector version of sincos for PPC64.
>>> The relevant discussion thread is on the GLIBC libc-alp
Greetings Jonathan and Jason,
I was wondering what work is required to move to C++11. Seems your
both interested in getting this done and so am I. Perhaps we start
similar to Git with a wiki page about what features would be useful
and then start migrating the makefiles to allow for this.
So
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, September 30, 2019 9:52 AM, Szabolcs Nagy
wrote:
> On 27/09/2019 20:23, GT wrote:
>
> > I am attempting to create a vector version of sincos for PPC64.
> > The relevant discussion thread is on the GLIBC libc-alpha mailing list.
> > Navigate it beginnin
Hello,my love. I seen you in Facebook today and so I would like to see you.
Ma name Grace
I do some Account wit my nice pictures.
I will waiting your arms.
my second nickname : Phelps442.
honey find me!!
Hello,
I thought I'd seek advice on how to get the Modula-2 front end into
trunk and also give a state of play.
State of play
=
Currently the gm2-trunk passes all but one regression test on amd64.
Other architectures/platforms vary. In early September the whole number
overflow de
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019, Martin Ling wrote:
> For starters, by doing this I have implicitly invented an ABI for fixed
> point types on x86 (they get passed exactly like correspondingly-sized
> integers, I suppose). This ABI would be unique to gcc.
>
> I have also implicitly set the numbers of integra
Hi all, new to the list.
Attached is a very short patch which enables the use of fixed point
modes on x86 targets. I first created this a couple of years ago for
gcc 7 and have just updated it for current git master.
I have not sent this to the patches list as I do not expect it to be
anywhere ne
Hi GNU.ORG,
I am getting the error below when I try to compile gcc-4.8.0. Can someone
assist me with a possible solution:
"/tmp/gcc-4.8.0/libcpp/files.c", line 1268: Error: Cannot assign char* to int.
"/tmp/gcc-4.8.0/libcpp/files.c", line 1371: Warning (Anachronism): Formal
argument 2 of type
I've implemented LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS and that implementation is
calling find_reloads_address_1.
My implementation adds double indirect addressing to the m68k target and
since the use of an outer index register or offset depends on the use of
an inner index register or offset, since only one
On 27/09/2019 20:23, GT wrote:
> I am attempting to create a vector version of sincos for PPC64.
> The relevant discussion thread is on the GLIBC libc-alpha mailing list.
> Navigate it beginning at
> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-09/msg00334.html
>
> The intention is to reuse as much
15 matches
Mail list logo