gcc-7-20190425 is now available

2019-04-25 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-7-20190425 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7-20190425/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 7 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-7

SAP CRM Accounts

2019-04-25 Thread Karla Armstrong
Hi there, I wanted to check if you'd be interested in purchasing 2019 updated SAP CRM Users Contact for your marketing initiatives? We also have Users of: Microsoft Dynamics 365, Pipedrive, Zoho and HubSpot CRM etc. Help me out with your Target geography: _. Let me

Re: GCC 9.0.1 Status Report (2019-04-25)

2019-04-25 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 19:38, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Status > == > > We have reached zero P1 regressions today and branches/gcc-9-branch has > been created; GCC 9.1-rc1 will be built and announced likely tomorrow. > The branch is now frozen for blocking regressions and documentation > fixes

GCC 10.0.0 Status Report (2019-04-25)

2019-04-25 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Status == The trunk has branched for the GCC 9 release and is now open again for general development, stage 1. Please consider not disrupting it too much during the RC phase of GCC 9 so it is possible to test important fixes for 9.1 on it. Quality Data Priority # Ch

GCC 9.0.1 Status Report (2019-04-25)

2019-04-25 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Status == We have reached zero P1 regressions today and branches/gcc-9-branch has been created; GCC 9.1-rc1 will be built and announced likely tomorrow. The branch is now frozen for blocking regressions and documentation fixes only, all changes to the branch require a RM approval now. If no

What's the status of of D on mingw?

2019-04-25 Thread Rainer Emrich
Does anybody knows what's the plans for D on mingw. AFAIS the frontend builds and is enabled for mingw. But the D runtime is disabled for mingw and doesn't build. A quick dive into the source showed that there is code for mingw target. But it looks like the wrong configuration is selected. Any i

Re: C provenance semantics proposal

2019-04-25 Thread Peter Sewell
On 25/04/2019, Richard Biener wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 3:03 PM Peter Sewell > wrote: >> >> On 25/04/2019, Richard Biener wrote: >> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:18 PM Peter Sewell >> > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 24/04/2019, Jeff Law wrote: >> >> > On 4/24/19 4:19 AM, Richard Biener wrot

Re: C provenance semantics proposal

2019-04-25 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 3:03 PM Peter Sewell wrote: > > On 25/04/2019, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:18 PM Peter Sewell > > wrote: > >> > >> On 24/04/2019, Jeff Law wrote: > >> > On 4/24/19 4:19 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 3:42 PM Jeff Law w

Re: C provenance semantics proposal

2019-04-25 Thread Peter Sewell
On 25/04/2019, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:18 PM Peter Sewell > wrote: >> >> On 24/04/2019, Jeff Law wrote: >> > On 4/24/19 4:19 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 3:42 PM Jeff Law wrote: >> >>> >> >>> On 4/18/19 6:20 AM, Uecker, Martin wrote: >>

Re: C provenance semantics proposal

2019-04-25 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:18 PM Peter Sewell wrote: > > On 24/04/2019, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 4/24/19 4:19 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 3:42 PM Jeff Law wrote: > >>> > >>> On 4/18/19 6:20 AM, Uecker, Martin wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 18.04.2019, 11:45 +0100 schri

Re: C provenance semantics proposal

2019-04-25 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 8:41 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > On 4/24/19 4:19 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 3:42 PM Jeff Law wrote: > >> > >> On 4/18/19 6:20 AM, Uecker, Martin wrote: > >>> Am Donnerstag, den 18.04.2019, 11:45 +0100 schrieb Peter Sewell: > On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 a