Snapshot gcc-6-20180613 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20180613/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6
U.Mutlu wrote on 06/13/2018 10:26 PM:
Andrew Pinski wrote on 06/13/2018 10:06 PM:
On Wednesday, June 13, 2018, U.Mutlu mailto:u...@mutluit.com>>
wrote:
Hi,
currently -v (ie. gcc -v) prints these data:
gcc version 9.0.0 20180613 (experimental) (GCC)
It would be nice
Here is the missing part of the can_advance patch.
* include/debug/helper_functions.h
(__gnu_debug::_Safe_iterator<>): Add declaration.
(__can_advance(_Ite, _Size)): New.
(__can_advance(const _Safe_iterator<>&, _Size)): Overload declaration.
* include/debug/functions.h
(__
Andrew Pinski wrote on 06/13/2018 10:06 PM:
On Wednesday, June 13, 2018, U.Mutlu mailto:u...@mutluit.com>>
wrote:
Hi,
currently -v (ie. gcc -v) prints these data:
gcc version 9.0.0 20180613 (experimental) (GCC)
It would be nice, when building from a repository that th
2018 UNPAID FUND RECOVERED LETTER
On Wednesday, June 13, 2018, U.Mutlu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently -v (ie. gcc -v) prints these data:
>
> gcc version 9.0.0 20180613 (experimental) (GCC)
>
> It would be nice, when building from a repository that then the resulting
> target should contain also the revi
Hi,
currently -v (ie. gcc -v) prints these data:
gcc version 9.0.0 20180613 (experimental) (GCC)
It would be nice, when building from a repository that then the resulting
target should contain also the revision number (for example "r261543")
of the underlying repository, so that g
I pick up the wrong "can_advance" patch. I should have taken another one
first.
So I'll send and apply the missing one providing the debug __can_advance
in a couple of hours.
Sorry
On 13/06/2018 15:24, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 13/06/18 13:42 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 13/06/2018
On 13/06/18 13:42 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 13/06/2018 08:11, François Dumont wrote:
On 12/06/2018 23:26, Martin Sebor wrote:
Bootstrap fails in libstdc++ with the following error.
I haven't investigated it much except to take a peek
at recent libstdc++ commits where r261525 looks lik
Hi,
On 13/06/2018 08:11, François Dumont wrote:
On 12/06/2018 23:26, Martin Sebor wrote:
Bootstrap fails in libstdc++ with the following error.
I haven't investigated it much except to take a peek
at recent libstdc++ commits where r261525 looks like it
introduced __glibcxx_check_can_increment_r
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 11:42 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
> Howdy.
>
> Am I missing something or are these two sets identical?
>
> > /* Get the lower and upper bounds of the type. */
> > if (TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (expr_type))
> > {
> > type_min = wi::min_value (p
Improving Patient Safety & Care 2019
Continuous Learning, Measurement & Improvement
6th of February 2019 - RSM, London
As part of our ongoing series of conferences aimed at delivering key
information and evidence based solutions in order to assist the
communication and delivery of the NHS 5 yr for
Hi.
There's working patch that really generates lto-dump binary.
Martin
diff --git a/gcc/lto/Make-lang.in b/gcc/lto/Make-lang.in
index 46950776dd2..502afe94851 100644
--- a/gcc/lto/Make-lang.in
+++ b/gcc/lto/Make-lang.in
@@ -21,10 +21,14 @@
# The name of the LTO compiler.
LTO_EXE = lto1$(exe
13 matches
Mail list logo
