I'm waiting for your response

2018-04-25 Thread Vincent Forbes via Nextdoor
Vincent Forbes has invited you to join Nextdoor. Nextdoor is a private social network that helps neighbors connect with each other to build stronger communities. To accept your invitation, follow the link below: https://nextdoor.com/invitation/?i=ggkkfghlzxggthdsqdsl&stage=2 ---

gcc-6-20180425 is now available

2018-04-25 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-6-20180425 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20180425/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6

MIPS maintainership

2018-04-25 Thread Moore, Catherine
Hi all, I need to resign as maintainer for the MIPS port. My work commitments have taken me in a different direction and as a result I haven't been able to actively participate over the last year. I don't see that changing anytime soon. I hope that someone with the interest and the time is a

Re: GCC 8.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2018-04-25 Thread Bill Seurer
On 04/25/2018 05:04 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8.0.1-RC-20180425/ The first release candidate for GCC 8.1 is available from ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8.0.1-RC-20180425 and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 259636. I

Re: [RFC] Deprecate "implicit int" for main() in C++

2018-04-25 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 25/04/18 13:13 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote: On 04/25/2018 12:45 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: @@ -15869,6 +15851,12 @@ finish_function (bool inline_p)     {   warning (OPT_Wreturn_type,   "no return statement in function returning non-void"); +  if (DECL_NAME (fndecl) == ass

Re: [RFC] Deprecate "implicit int" for main() in C++

2018-04-25 Thread Nathan Sidwell
On 04/25/2018 12:45 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: @@ -15869,6 +15851,12 @@ finish_function (bool inline_p)     {   warning (OPT_Wreturn_type,   "no return statement in function returning non-void"); +  if (DECL_NAME (fndecl) == assign_op_identifier) IDENTIFIER_ASSIGN_OP_P (

Re: [RFC] Deprecate "implicit int" for main() in C++

2018-04-25 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 25/04/18 12:22 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: On Wed, 2018-04-25 at 16:54 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 25/04/18 16:30 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 04/25/2018 03:04 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On 25/04/18 14:59 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: > > > On 04/25/2018 02:56 PM, Jason Merrill wrote

Re: [RFC] Deprecate "implicit int" for main() in C++

2018-04-25 Thread David Malcolm
On Wed, 2018-04-25 at 16:54 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 25/04/18 16:30 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: > > On 04/25/2018 03:04 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > On 25/04/18 14:59 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: > > > > On 04/25/2018 02:56 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: > > > > > The warning by default seems

Re: [RFC] Deprecate "implicit int" for main() in C++

2018-04-25 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 25/04/18 16:30 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: On 04/25/2018 03:04 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 25/04/18 14:59 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: On 04/25/2018 02:56 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: The warning by default seems sufficient to me. Yes. We've been bitten by this a few times, with mysterious cr

Re: [RFC] Deprecate "implicit int" for main() in C++

2018-04-25 Thread Jason Merrill
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 25/04/18 14:53 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: >> >> On 04/25/2018 01:23 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >>> We enabled -Wreturn-type by default in GCC 8, so code using the >>> extension will get warnings even without -Wall now. Users might wa

Re: [RFC] Deprecate "implicit int" for main() in C++

2018-04-25 Thread Andrew Haley
On 04/25/2018 03:04 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 25/04/18 14:59 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: >> On 04/25/2018 02:56 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: >>> The warning by default seems sufficient to me. >> >> Yes. We've been bitten by this a few times, with mysterious crashes. >> I'm not sure it even makes

Re: [RFC] Deprecate "implicit int" for main() in C++

2018-04-25 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 25/04/18 14:53 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: On 04/25/2018 01:23 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: We enabled -Wreturn-type by default in GCC 8, so code using the extension will get warnings even without -Wall now. Users might want to use -Werror=return-type to ensure they aren't bitten by the new opt

Re: [RFC] Deprecate "implicit int" for main() in C++

2018-04-25 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 25/04/18 14:59 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: On 04/25/2018 02:56 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: The warning by default seems sufficient to me. Yes. We've been bitten by this a few times, with mysterious crashes. I'm not sure it even makes sense only to be a warning, but I guess that's up to the C++

Re: [RFC] Deprecate "implicit int" for main() in C++

2018-04-25 Thread Andrew Haley
On 04/25/2018 02:56 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: > The warning by default seems sufficient to me. Yes. We've been bitten by this a few times, with mysterious crashes. I'm not sure it even makes sense only to be a warning, but I guess that's up to the C++ TC. -- Andrew Haley Java Platform Lead Engin

Re: [RFC] Deprecate "implicit int" for main() in C++

2018-04-25 Thread Jason Merrill
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:53 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 04/25/2018 01:23 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >> We enabled -Wreturn-type by default in GCC 8, so code using the >> extension will get warnings even without -Wall now. Users might want >> to use -Werror=return-type to ensure they aren't bit

Re: [RFC] Deprecate "implicit int" for main() in C++

2018-04-25 Thread Andrew Haley
On 04/25/2018 01:23 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > We enabled -Wreturn-type by default in GCC 8, so code using the > extension will get warnings even without -Wall now. Users might want > to use -Werror=return-type to ensure they aren't bitten by the new > optimizations that assume control never rea

Re: RFC: bash completion

2018-04-25 Thread Martin Liška
On 04/24/2018 06:27 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > The patch doesn't have tests. There would need to be some way to > achieve test coverage for the completion code (especially as we start > to tackle the more interesting cases). I wonder what the best way to > do that is; perhaps a combination of sel

Re: RFC: bash completion

2018-04-25 Thread Martin Liška
On 04/24/2018 06:27 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > On Tue, 2018-04-24 at 16:45 +0200, Martin Liška wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Some time ago, I investigated quite new feature of clang which >> is support of --autocomplete argument. That can be run from bash >> completion >> script and one gets more precise com

[RFC] Deprecate "implicit int" for main() in C++

2018-04-25 Thread Jonathan Wakely
G++ allows the 'main' function to be declared without a return type: $ gcc-8 -x c++ - <<< 'main() { }' :1:6: warning: ISO C++ forbids declaration of ‘main’ with no type [-Wreturn-type] We enabled -Wreturn-type by default in GCC 8, so code using the extension will get warnings even without -Wall

GCC 8.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2018-04-25 Thread Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8.0.1-RC-20180425/ The first release candidate for GCC 8.1 is available from ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8.0.1-RC-20180425 and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 259636. I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release

GCC 9.0.0 Status Report (2018-04-25)

2018-04-25 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Status == The trunk has branched for the GCC 8 release and is now open again for general development, stage 1. Please consider not disrupting it too much during the RC phase of GCC 8 so it is possible to test important fixes for 8.1 on it. Quality Data Priority # Cha

GCC 8.0.1 Status Report (2018-04-25)

2018-04-25 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Status == We have reached zero P1 regressions today (and < 100 important regressions) and branches/gcc-8-branch has been created; GCC 8.1-rc1 will be built and announced later today. The branch is now frozen for blocking regressions and documentation fixes only, all changes to the branch requi

Re: GSoC 2018: Hrishikesh Kulkarni has been selected to work on LTO dumping tool

2018-04-25 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 5:17 AM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks a lot for giving me this wonderful opportunity to work with GCC > under your guidance and mentorship (GSOC 2018). > > Just a few starting queries > >1. > >As a starting point to read lto-object file, is it suffici