Can somebody remind me why using -g doesn't also enable -fvar-tracking
by default? At least for -g2, which is supposed to emit debug
information about local variables? It seems kind of counterintuitive to
me that specifying a -O option enables a pass to collect better debug
information but sp
I'm wondering what is the role of r9 on ARM32, on Linux and Android.
On Apple it is documented as long ago reserved, these days available for
scratch.
I've looked around a bit but haven't gotten the full answer.
It is "the PIC register", I see.
What does that imply? Volatile? Von-volatile?
I
On 04/23/2018 01:00 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 4:27 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
A few days ago there was a rant on the Fortran Standardization Committee's
e-mail list about Fortran's "whole array arithmetic" being unoptimizable.
An example picked at random from our weather fo
On Mon, 2018-04-16 at 20:34 -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Hi David & Gerald,
(sorry for the late response; I was offline on vacation last week)
> I noticed that the coding examples in the updates I committed
> to changes.html use a different formatting style than David's.
> I just copied mine from
On 23 April 2018 at 15:11, Jason Vas Dias wrote:
> Please can GCC fix this warning bug eventually - I have to wade
> through code that generates thousands of them per compilation.
gcc@gcc.gnu.org is for discussing development of GCC, not bugs.
gcc-b...@gcc.gnu.org is for automated emails generated
I really do not think a '-Wpedantic -Wconversion' warning should
be generated for the following code, but it is
(with GCC 6.4.1 and 7.3.1 on RHEL-7.5 Linux) :
$ echo '
typedef unsigned short U16_t;
static void f(void)
{ U16_t a = 1;
a-=1;
}' > t.C;
$ g++ -std=c++14 -Wall -Wextra -pedant
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Janne Blomqvist
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
>> >> A few days ago there was a rant on the Fortran Standardizatio
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
> >> A few days ago there was a rant on the Fortran Standardization
> Committee's
> >> e-mail list about Fortran's "whole array arit
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
>> A few days ago there was a rant on the Fortran Standardization Committee's
>> e-mail list about Fortran's "whole array arithmetic" being unoptimizable.
>>
>> An example picked at random from
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 4:27 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
> A few days ago there was a rant on the Fortran Standardization Committee's
> e-mail list about Fortran's "whole array arithmetic" being unoptimizable.
>
> An example picked at random from our weather forecasting code:
>
> ZQICE(1:NPROMA,1:NF
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
> A few days ago there was a rant on the Fortran Standardization Committee's
> e-mail list about Fortran's "whole array arithmetic" being unoptimizable.
>
> An example picked at random from our weather forecasting code:
>
> ZQICE(1:NPROMA,1:NF
11 matches
Mail list logo
