Re: GSOC Question about the parallelization project

2018-03-23 Thread Sebastiaan Peters
>On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 8:04 PM, Sebastiaan Peters > wrote: >>>On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Sebastiaan Peters >>> wrote: >On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3:49 PM, David Malcolm wrote: >> On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 14:02 +0100, Richard Biener wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Richard

Re: Can I use -Ofast without libmvec

2018-03-23 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 7:47 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:08:58AM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote: >> I have a question about the math vector library routines in libmvec. >> If I compile a program on x86 with -Ofast, something like: >> >> void foo(double * __restrict x, double *

Re: Please improve wording of explanation of a Gfortran extension

2018-03-23 Thread Jonathan Wakely
CCing the fortran list. On 23 March 2018 at 11:55, Cyril Magnin wrote: > On the page > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Unary-operators.html#Unary-operators, > we find the following statement: > > 6.1.11 Unary operators >> >> As an extension, GNU Fortran allows unary plus and unary minus o

Please improve wording of explanation of a Gfortran extension

2018-03-23 Thread Cyril Magnin
On the page https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Unary-operators.html#Unary-operators, we find the following statement: 6.1.11 Unary operators > > As an extension, GNU Fortran allows unary plus and unary minus operators > to appear as the second operand of binary arithmetic operators without th