Marek Polacek writes:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 09:13:40AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 05/17/2017 04:23 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>> > Hi folks.
>> >
>> > I've been having troubles comparing the results of different test runs
>> > for quite some time, and have finally decided to whine about it.
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Will Hawkins wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Will Hawkins wrote:
>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Will Hawkins wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/17/2017 10:36 AM, Will Hawkins wrote:
> As I started looking in
Snapshot gcc-6-20170517 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20170517/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Will Hawkins wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Will Hawkins wrote:
>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 05/17/2017 10:36 AM, Will Hawkins wrote:
As I started looking into this, it seems like PLUGIN_FINISH is where
my plugin
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Will Hawkins wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 05/17/2017 10:36 AM, Will Hawkins wrote:
>>> As I started looking into this, it seems like PLUGIN_FINISH is where
>>> my plugin will go. Everything is great so far. However, when plugins
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 05/17/2017 10:36 AM, Will Hawkins wrote:
>> As I started looking into this, it seems like PLUGIN_FINISH is where
>> my plugin will go. Everything is great so far. However, when plugins
>> at that event are invoked, they get no data. That means
On 05/17/2017 10:36 AM, Will Hawkins wrote:
> As I started looking into this, it seems like PLUGIN_FINISH is where
> my plugin will go. Everything is great so far. However, when plugins
> at that event are invoked, they get no data. That means I will have to
> look into global structures for inform
As I started looking into this, it seems like PLUGIN_FINISH is where
my plugin will go. Everything is great so far. However, when plugins
at that event are invoked, they get no data. That means I will have to
look into global structures for information regarding the compilation.
Are there pointers
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 10:41 +0100, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> I happen to be working on loop distribution now (If guess correctly,
> to get hmmer fixed). So far my idea is to fuse the finest
> distributed
> loop in two passes, in the first pass, we merge all SCCs due to
> "true"
> data dependence; in the
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 09:13:40AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 05/17/2017 04:23 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > Hi folks.
> >
> > I've been having troubles comparing the results of different test runs
> > for quite some time, and have finally decided to whine about it. Perhaps
> > someone can point
On 05/17/2017 04:23 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I've been having troubles comparing the results of different test runs
> for quite some time, and have finally decided to whine about it. Perhaps
> someone can point out to whatever I may be doing wrong.
>
> I generally do "make check
On 05/17/2017 07:28 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 17 May 2017 at 11:23, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>> Has anyone seen this behavior? Is it my test box? Are there known problems
>> with parallel checks?
>
> Smells like https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77684
>
Yup. Note that I ack'd a p
On 17 May 2017 at 11:23, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Has anyone seen this behavior? Is it my test box? Are there known problems
> with parallel checks?
Smells like https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77684
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I've been having troubles comparing the results of different test runs for
> quite some time, and have finally decided to whine about it. Perhaps someone
> can point out to whatever I may be doing wrong.
>
> I generally do "ma
Hi folks.
I've been having troubles comparing the results of different test runs
for quite some time, and have finally decided to whine about it.
Perhaps someone can point out to whatever I may be doing wrong.
I generally do "make check -k -j60" on two different trees and compare
the results
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On May 15, 2017 6:56:53 PM GMT+02:00, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>>On Sat, 2017-05-13 at 08:18 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On May 12, 2017 10:42:34 PM GMT+02:00, Steve Ellcey >> om> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > (Short version of this email, is there a
16 matches
Mail list logo
