On 2017.04.01 at 01:00 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> The following patch implements a new function-body-elision
> optimization, which can dramatically improve performance,
> especially under certain benchmarks.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> * common.opt (felide-function-bodies): New option.
> *
The following patch implements a new function-body-elision
optimization, which can dramatically improve performance,
especially under certain benchmarks.
For example, given this test program...
$ cat test.c
int factorial (int i)
{
if (i > 1)
return i * factorial (i - 1);
else
return
I got the hint, that gcc-help might not be the best mailing list for my
issue, therefor I post it here again (sorry for double-posting):
I work on a gcc plugin which provides a dependency model of the compiled
sources.
The information is derived by walking the generic tree and collecting
decla
What a blunder.
> But you do know that methods have an extra (first, actually) parameter
> containing the this pointer, right?
I totally missed it. Thank you for informing me.
I tested it with a dummy parameter. The dummy parameter taking the
place of the this pointer. It worked perfectly.
Obviou
Hi Joseph. (reviving a thread from 2009)
I have been streamlining the execution
of MVS (i370) via my "runmvs" script
recently, and now it only takes a few
seconds to do a test on MVS because
I have taken out all the unnecessary
pauses and made lots of other
improvements, and bypassing bugs
in Her
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 08:56:26AM +0200, Andre Groenewald wrote:
> Sorry about the fwd in the description.
>
> This is my implementation:
>
> fnDeclType = build_function_type_array(integer_type_node,
> argVect.NumOfItems, parmTypes);
> tree fnDecl = build_fn_decl(identifier->Str, fnDeclType
