On 15/02/17 01:49, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
With the Qualcomm takeover of Freescale/NXP I guess the PowerPC has no
future in this area and they will move to ARM for the processor cores.
That is my understanding as well, yes.
Our reps have suggested that the opposite may well be the case: It
On 15/02/17 01:49, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
It is also used in many PPC based microcontrollers, which are used in
the automotive industry and other places where you need highly reliable
and robust but powerful microcontrollers. However, gcc support for
these has traditionally been poor - there
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 15 February 2017 at 15:53, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Jonathan Wakely
>> wrote:
>>> On 11 February 2017 at 20:36, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 02/11/2017 06:21 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On
The DWARF Debugging Information Format Standards Committee is pleased to announce the availability
of Version 5 of the DWARF Debugging Format Standard. The DWARF Debugging Format is used to
communicate debugging information between a compiler and debugger to make it easier for programmers
to d
On 15 February 2017 at 15:53, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
>> On 11 February 2017 at 20:36, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>>> On 02/11/2017 06:21 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 11 February 2017 at 08:48, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
> On F
Bruce Berman
Carlton Fields
Off: +1 (305) 539-7415
Cell: +1 (305) 975-3467
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 11 February 2017 at 20:36, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>> On 02/11/2017 06:21 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11 February 2017 at 08:48, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>
> The docum
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:34:26AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 06:38:40PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:36:02AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
>> > > Since we've been talking about obsoleti