> Have any back ends been converted since the default was changed, that
> did not already have LRA support? I looked at this in the context of
> nios2 a few months ago (when we were still in stage 1) but didn't see an
> example patch set for any other back end, or a good description of what
> I ne
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016, mirr...@letterboxdelivery.org wrote:
> We're supporters of your project and have created a mirror.
>
> Location: Tokyo, Japan
>
> Mirror: http://gcc.letterboxdelivery.org (http) |
> rsync://gcc.letterboxdelivery.org/gcc (rsync)
>
> Mirror contact email: mirr...@letterboxdeli
On 01/03/2017 02:22 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
p.s. Are there plans for converting the SPARC port?
The SPARC port has now been converted.
Note that the status of the PowerPC port is a bit confusing because both
doc/invoke.texi and htdocs/backends.html say that it still uses reload.
Have any b
Snapshot gcc-5-20170103 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20170103/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-5
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> p.s. Are there plans for converting the SPARC port?
>
> Note that the status of the PowerPC port is a bit confusing because both
> doc/invoke.texi and htdocs/backends.html say that it still uses reload.
Fixed.
Thanks, David
From: Eric Botcazou
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 22:22:05 +0100
>> p.s. Are there plans for converting the SPARC port?
>
> The SPARC port has now been converted.
Thanks so much for doing this work, I wish I could have been more
helpful.
> p.s. Are there plans for converting the SPARC port?
The SPARC port has now been converted.
Note that the status of the PowerPC port is a bit confusing because both
doc/invoke.texi and htdocs/backends.html say that it still uses reload.
--
Eric Botcazou
